Epstein Secrets

21 22 23 24 25 that are relevant to that, which I was going to get to, your Honor, are Khashoggi, U.S. v. Khashoggi, U.S. v. Bodmer, U.S. v. Hanson, and Sabhnani itself, all of which involve defendants with substantial connections. And I might follow up on your Honor's question, when you take

leged as to our client, certainly in the past year, and strict release was approved with strict bail conditions. In Bodmer, which was before Judge Scheindlin in 2004, the defendant was a Swiss citizen, and Switzerland had taken the position it would not extradite its citizens for proceedings in the Unit

When determining whether these minimum contacts are present, it is the quality and not necessarily the quantity of contacts that is determinative. Hanson' Denclda, 357 U.S. 235, 253 (1958). Further, because the Plaintiff claims that specific jurisdiction exists in this case, the relevant contacts ar

manu- facturing plants. Following settlement with one alleged conspirator, remaining conspira- tor moved for summary judgment. The Dis- trict Court, Scheindlin, J., held that: (1) there was fact issue whether conspiracy existed to limit trade in resin; (2) termination was ancil- lary restraint of trade, pr

21 22 23 24 25 that are relevant to that, which I was going to get to, your Honor, are Khashoggi, U.S. v. Khashoggi, U.S. v. Bodmer, U.S. v. Hanson, and Sabhnani itself, all of which involve defendants with substantial connections. And I might follow up on your Honor's question, when you take

leged as to our client, certainly in the past year, and strict release was approved with strict bail conditions. In Bodmer, which was before Judge Scheindlin in 2004, the defendant was a Swiss citizen, and Switzerland had taken the position it would not extradite its citizens for proceedings in the Unit