Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ciable deterrence." United States v. Eldred, 933 F.3d 110, 118 (2d Cir. 2019) (quoting Herring v. United States, 555 U.S. 135, 141 (2009)); see also Herring, 555 U.S. at 144 (concluding that "[t]o trigger the exclusionary rule, police conduct must be sufficiently deliberate that exclusion can meaningful
dment, or by a statutory grant of use immunity, and that a protective order therefore cannot be used to abridge a witness' fifth amendment rights." Andover Data Servs., 876 F.2d at 1083 (emphasis in original); see id. at 1084 ("Uncertainty about the ultimate outcome of a protective order will mean that no deponen
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ciable deterrence." United States v. Eldred, 933 F.3d 110, 118 (2d Cir. 2019) (quoting Herring v. United States, 555 U.S. 135, 141 (2009)); see also Herring, 555 U.S. at 144 (concluding that "[t]o trigger the exclusionary rule, police conduct must be sufficiently deliberate that exclusion can meaningful
dment, or by a statutory grant of use immunity, and that a protective order therefore cannot be used to abridge a witness' fifth amendment rights." Andover Data Servs., 876 F.2d at 1083 (emphasis in original); see id. at 1084 ("Uncertainty about the ultimate outcome of a protective order will mean that no deponen
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ciable deterrence." United States v. Eldred, 933 F.3d 110, 118 (2d Cir. 2019) (quoting Herring v. United States, 555 U.S. 135, 141 (2009)); see also Herring, 555 U.S. at 144 (concluding that "[t]o trigger the exclusionary rule, police conduct must be sufficiently deliberate that exclusion can meaningful
dment, or by a statutory grant of use immunity, and that a protective order therefore cannot be used to abridge a witness' fifth amendment rights." Andover Data Servs., 876 F.2d at 1083 (emphasis in original); see id. at 1084 ("Uncertainty about the ultimate outcome of a protective order will mean that no deponen
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ciable deterrence." United States v. Eldred, 933 F.3d 110, 118 (2d Cir. 2019) (quoting Herring v. United States, 555 U.S. 135, 141 (2009)); see also Herring, 555 U.S. at 144 (concluding that "[t]o trigger the exclusionary rule, police conduct must be sufficiently deliberate that exclusion can meaningful
dment, or by a statutory grant of use immunity, and that a protective order therefore cannot be used to abridge a witness' fifth amendment rights." Andover Data Servs., 876 F.2d at 1083 (emphasis in original); see id. at 1084 ("Uncertainty about the ultimate outcome of a protective order will mean that no deponen
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (269)
Entities connected to both Herring and Andover Data Servs
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON15 w/ Herring·16 w/ Andover
United States
LOCATION10 w/ Herring·16 w/ Andover
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON9 w/ Herring·16 w/ Andover
David Boies
PERSON7 w/ Herring·16 w/ Andover
Julie K. Brown
PERSON6 w/ Herring·16 w/ Andover
the Southern District
LOCATION6 w/ Herring·16 w/ Andover
CM
Colleen McMahon
PERSON5 w/ Herring·16 w/ Andover
MA
Martindell
PERSON5 w/ Herring·16 w/ Andover
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION6 w/ Herring·14 w/ Andover
the Second Circuit's
ORGANIZATION6 w/ Herring·14 w/ Andover
Bradley Edwards
PERSON10 w/ Herring·9 w/ Andover
CA
Canfield
PERSON5 w/ Herring·14 w/ Andover
FI
Fisher
PERSON5 w/ Herring·14 w/ Andover
Carpenter
PERSON5 w/ Herring·14 w/ Andover
Eric Schmidt
PERSON5 w/ Herring·14 w/ Andover
MF
Maria Farmer
PERSON10 w/ Herring·8 w/ Andover
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON10 w/ Herring·8 w/ Andover
George Mitchell
PERSON8 w/ Herring·9 w/ Andover
Statistical Tabulating Corp.
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Herring·11 w/ Andover
SD
Subpoena Duces
PERSON5 w/ Herring·11 w/ Andover