Epstein Secrets

deny the amendment. IL. Discussion “The decision whether to grant leave to amend a complaint is within the sole discretion of the district court.” Laurie v. Ala. Ct. Crim. Apps., 256 F.3d 1266, 1274 (11th Cir. 2001). “The court should freely give leave when justice so requires.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2

. . undue prejudice to the opposing party by virtue of allowance of the amendment, [and] futility of amendment.’” Laurie, 256 F.3d at 1274 (quoting Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182 (1962)). In addition to considering the effect of amendment on the parties, the court must consider “the importance of t

deny the amendment. II. Discussion “The decision whether to grant leave to amend a complaint is within the sole discretion of the district court.” Laurie v. Ala. Ct. Crim. Apps., 256 F.3d 1266, 1274 (11th Cir. 2001). “The court should freely give leave when justice so requires.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(

. . . undue prejudice to the opposing party by virtue of allowance of the amendment, [and] futility of amendment.’” Laurie, 256 F.3d at 1274 (quoting Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182 (1962)). In addition to considering the effect of amendment on the parties, the court must consider “the importance of th

(enid h) q 1 54t4) EFTA00191502 cell 07 785 996600 asst. (h) 0208-673 5090(renata) Larsen Janet 30 Rutland rte don 51Aq 0kop207-581 7073 Laurie, Jonathan 28 Cheshirp6 Place London $ 21.2 5 ' h 838;:i89 4 1‘4 Laviada, Laura D.B. de 52 5$ 55407444 25 5405603 mail: mviadahtmail.corn 52

r, Dan 721 5th n739 NY 001 001 001 h c) tvOlict • EFTA00191490 Park House 7.11 Onlow SO London 1A7 J 017-22 314 (w) 0171-581 118 11) Foman, Bobby & Jeanette r/o, Forbes Zand 001 017 8-16 7617 pf Forbes, Chris (Kip) Astrid Knishtinoram• 95 Old Dutch Road (h) Far Hills N York ve