Epstein Secrets

owed up. 2422(b); 2594(a) Not Consummated Showed up for meeting 50 EFTA00224184 COURT CASES FACILITY FACTS/COMMUNICATION CHARGE 11. U.S.' Clarke, 159 Fed. Appx. 128 (11th Cir. 2005) Unpublished Foreign Travel Sting No specific information available but implication is that this is a sex t

gal state arrest"; Motion to suppress denied. 2252A(a)(5) (B); 2422(b) Not Consummated Showed up for meeting Sting (by state) D. Kan. U.S. I Riccardi, 258 F. Supp. 2d 1212 (D. Kan 2003) Internet & telephone Approached 3 different minor males; asked them to go to the woods to spank themselves

state interest is relatively minimal and United States treaty obligations have made federal intervention a high priority. See, e.g., United States 'Clarke, 159 Fed. Appx. 128, 2005 WL 3438434 (It ch Cir. 2005)(unpublished); United States I Strevell, 185 Fed. Appx. 841, 2005 WL 1697529 (11th Cir. 2006)

ses. The seizure and subsequent search of the computers and computer-related items clearly violated the Fourth Amendment. See, e.g., United States' Riccardi, 405 F.3d 852, 862-63 (10th Cir. 2005) (warrant authorizing seizure of computer, all electronic and magnetic media stored therein, and a host of ex

ting 48 EFTA01729532 . .— . ... . COURT LASES . n. .!. C . i „... ,, ., . , .. ous 44 ,-;..f.,400fispmtclti textig L- . - . U.S. v. Clarke, 159 Fed. Appx. 128 (11'' Cir. 2005) Unpublished Foreign Travel Sting No specific information available but implication is that this is a sex

ng ) No Information 82 EFTA01729566 coURT * CASES ' • . - '• • • VA.004TY- . ,,VA.CTS/COM ivittiVICAtf50' ::• , -CcfrAlIGC U.S. v. Riccardi, 258 F. Supp. 2d 1212 (D. Kan. 2003) No Information No specific information available other than ; telephone calls to 3 different minor males.

state interest is relatively minimal and United States treaty obligations have made federal intervention a high priority. See, e.g., United States' Clarke, 159 Fed. Appx. 128, 2005 WL 3438434 (11th Cir. 2005Xunpublished); United StatesIStrevell, 185 Fed. Appx. 841, 2005 WI. 1697529 (II' Cir. 2006Xunpu

ses. The seizure and subsequent search of the computers and computer-related items clearly violated the Fourth Amendment. See, e.g., United States' Riccardi, 40513d 852, 862-63 (10th Cir. 2005) (warrant authorizing seizure of computer, all electronic an magnetic media stored therein, and a host of exter