Epstein Secrets

owed up. 2422(b); 2594(a) Not Consummated Showed up for meeting 50 EFTA00224184 COURT CASES FACILITY FACTS/COMMUNICATION CHARGE 11. U.S.' Clarke, 159 Fed. Appx. 128 (11th Cir. 2005) Unpublished Foreign Travel Sting No specific information available but implication is that this is a sex t

or but instead undercover agent. Appellate court affirmed enhancement because pattern of activity used minor interchangeably with victim. U.S. I Manley, Slip Copy, 2007 WL 1379982 (11th Cir. 2007) Slip Copy Not for Publication Internet Internet chat room communications between father of 12 yr

ting 48 EFTA01729532 . .— . ... . COURT LASES . n. .!. C . i „... ,, ., . , .. ous 44 ,-;..f.,400fispmtclti textig L- . - . U.S. v. Clarke, 159 Fed. Appx. 128 (11'' Cir. 2005) Unpublished Foreign Travel Sting No specific information available but implication is that this is a sex

r but instead undercover agent. Appellate court affirmed enhancement because pattern of activity used minor interchangeably with victim. U.S. v. Manley, • Slip Copy, 2007 WL Slip Copy Not for Internet Internet chat room communications between father of 12 yr-old boy and 2422(6); 2252A(a)(1) &

8 EFTA00079461 4 VAT ' ' ''; - . • *-- - il tlIitakt . . - -2 M lar ft; ..... IgeffAIKOE:% ASc. :4.e tfa.1. i' I. Aa.:1 Z' U.S. v. Clarke, 159 Fed. Appx. 128 (111h Cir. 2005) Unpublished Foreign Travel Sting No specific information available but implication is that this is a sex

r but instead undercover agent. Appellate court affirmed enhancement because pattern of activity used minor interchangeably with victim. U.S. v. Manley, Slip Copy, 2007 WL Slip Copy Not for Internet Internet chat room communications between father of 12 yr-old boy and 2422(b); 2252A(a)(1) & (

f violence. Affirmed. 52 EFTA00226344 f;,- t:i• j I _. . ____. ,. _ CILITY . , . FA S7C0 tv hi C. . -7. x CT - - - . . CHARGE U.S. I Clarke, 159 Fed. Appx. 128 (11th Cir. 2005) Unpublished Foreign Travel Sting No specific information available but implication is that this is a sex t

or but instead undercover agent. Appellate court affirmed enhancement because pattern of activity used minor interchangeably with victim. U.S.'. Manley, Slip Copy, 2007 WL Slip Copy Not for Internet Internet chat room communications between father of 12 yr-old boy and 2422(b); 2252A(a)(1) & (