Epstein Secrets

tate interest is relatively minimal and United States treaty obligations have made federal intervention a high priority. See, e.g., United States v. Clarke, 159 Fed. Appx. 128, 2005 WL 3438434 (11th Cir. 2005Xunpublished); United States v. Strevell, 185 Fed. Appx. 841, 2005 WL 1697529 (11th Cir. 2006Xu

bstantial glaring, facial deficiencies that a motion to suppress would likely result in the suppression of all items seized during the search of 358 El Brillo, as well as all evidence derived from the search, both physical and testimonial. In addition, the affidavit prepared by Det. MI in support of the

state interest is relatively minimal and United States treaty obligations have made federal intervention a high priority. See, e.g., United States 'Clarke, 159 Fed. Appx. 128, 2005 WL 3438434 (It ch Cir. 2005)(unpublished); United States I Strevell, 185 Fed. Appx. 841, 2005 WL 1697529 (11th Cir. 2006)

bstantial glaring, facial deficiencies that a motion to suppress would likely result in the suppression of all items seized during the search of 358 El Brillo, as well as all evidence derived from the search, both physical and testimonial. In addition, the affidavit prepared by Det. Recarey in support of

l, 2CO7 Itl AV T to 0 2O77IMPOutel Irc O 211O7NDWIEO Mangonia 1 N n iVesiPalm Beach cahn end, ere Rd fr-,) cud laksi 13203 M It: MEG ft Clarke ?KIM ings cep O 2OCONAvrIO oxa a c ee, FL 33470-4231, US MAPOWESI ni `7O4 I16O0 fit I 4000 ft Lo • ahatchea (t11,/r =.13a All rights rese

/27/2005 03/21/2005, I coordinated with PB BSF Unit Lo initiate surveillance on 03/21/2005, Coordinated with Det. re ardin trash pulls from 358 El Brillo. On this same date I calk to schedule an appointment to speak with . She state t e sc ool guidance counselor was reluctant tollilie police presen

tate interest is relatively minimal and United States treaty obligations have made federal intervention a high priority. See, e.g., United States v. Clarke, 159 Fed. Appx. 128, 2005 WL 3438434 (11th Cir. 2005)(unpublished); United States v. Strevell, 185 Fed. Appx. 841, 2005 WI, 1697529 (11th Cir. 2006

bstantial glaring, facial deficiencies that a motion to suppress would likely result in the suppression of all items seized during the search of 358 El Brillo, as well as all evidence derived from the search, both physical and testimonial. In addition, the affidavit prepared by Det. Recarey in support of

state interest is relatively minimal and United States treaty obligations have made federal intervention a high priority. See, e.g., United States' Clarke, 159 Fed. Appx. 128, 2005 WL 3438434 (11th Cir. 2005Xunpublished); United StatesIStrevell, 185 Fed. Appx. 841, 2005 WI. 1697529 (II' Cir. 2006Xunpu

.' Mr. Epstein has owned a home in Florida since September, 1990 - longer than any other residence he has owned - when he purchased the property on El Brillo Way. lie spent substantial amounts of money during the relevant period to improve and to maintain this home. In addition, his travel records demons