Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
of privacy rather than that of a third party." United States v. Payner, 447 U.S. 727, 731 (1980) (emphasis in original); see also United States v. Villegas, 899 F.2d 1324, 1333 (2d Cir. 1990). Ultimately, the Fourth Amendment inquiry is "whether [a] defendant has established a legitimate expectation of
wyer is called "on a significant issue other than on behalf of the client, and it is apparent that the testimony may be prejudicial to the client." N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b); see generally Murray v. Met. Life Ins. Co., 583 F.3d 173, 177-80 (2d Cir. 2009) (discussing the advocate-witness rule). 149 EFTA00100116 VII.
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
of privacy rather than that of a third party." United States v. Payner, 447 U.S. 727, 731 (1980) (emphasis in original); see also United States v. Villegas, 899 F.2d 1324, 1333 (2d Cir. 1990). Ultimately, the Fourth Amendment inquiry is "whether [a] defendant has established a legitimate expectation of
wyer is called "on a significant issue other than on behalf of the client, and it is apparent that the testimony may be prejudicial to the client." N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b); see generally Murray v. Met. Life Ins. Co., 583 F.3d 173, 177-80 (2d Cir. 2009) (discussing the advocate-witness rule). 149 EFTA00077781 VII.
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
of privacy rather than that of a third party." United States v. Payner, 447 U.S. 727, 731 (1980) (emphasis in original); see also United States v. Villegas, 899 F.2d 1324, 1333 (2d Cir. 1990). Ultimately, the Fourth Amendment inquiry is "whether [a] defendant has established a legitimate expectation of
wyer is called "on a significant issue other than on behalf of the client, and it is apparent that the testimony may be prejudicial to the client." N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b); see generally Murray v. Met. Life Ins. Co., 583 F.3d 173, 177-80 (2d Cir. 2009) (discussing the advocate-witness rule). 149 EFTA00039596 VII.
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
of privacy rather than that of a third party." United States v. Payner, 447 U.S. 727, 731 (1980) (emphasis in original); see also United States v. Villegas, 899 F.2d 1324, 1333 (2d Cir. 1990). Ultimately, the Fourth Amendment inquiry is "whether [a] defendant has established a legitimate expectation of
wyer is called "on a significant issue other than on behalf of the client, and it is apparent that the testimony may be prejudicial to the client." N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b); see generally Murray v. Met. Life Ins. Co., 583 F.3d 173, 177-80 (2d Cir. 2009) (discussing the advocate-witness rule). 149 EFTA00103174 VII.
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (252)
Entities connected to both Villegas and N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON17 w/ Villegas·4 w/ N.Y.
Bradley Edwards
PERSON15 w/ Villegas·4 w/ N.Y.
the Southern District
LOCATION12 w/ Villegas·4 w/ N.Y.
United States
LOCATION11 w/ Villegas·4 w/ N.Y.
MF
Maria Farmer
PERSON11 w/ Villegas·4 w/ N.Y.
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON11 w/ Villegas·4 w/ N.Y.
Bill Richardson
PERSON10 w/ Villegas·4 w/ N.Y.
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON11 w/ Villegas·3 w/ N.Y.
George Mitchell
PERSON10 w/ Villegas·4 w/ N.Y.
Bronx
LOCATION10 w/ Villegas·4 w/ N.Y.
Anderson
PERSON10 w/ Villegas·4 w/ N.Y.
MW
Martin Weinberg
PERSON10 w/ Villegas·4 w/ N.Y.
Gillette
ORGANIZATION10 w/ Villegas·4 w/ N.Y.
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION10 w/ Villegas·4 w/ N.Y.
Kendall Coffey
PERSON10 w/ Villegas·4 w/ N.Y.
Mason
ORGANIZATION9 w/ Villegas·4 w/ N.Y.
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON9 w/ Villegas·4 w/ N.Y.
Adriana Ross
PERSON9 w/ Villegas·4 w/ N.Y.
Julie K. Brown
PERSON9 w/ Villegas·4 w/ N.Y.
Michael Jackson
PERSON9 w/ Villegas·4 w/ N.Y.