Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
of privacy rather than that of a third party." United States v. Payner, 447 U.S. 727, 731 (1980) (emphasis in original); see also United States v. Villegas, 899 F.2d 1324, 1333 (2d Cir. 1990). Ultimately, the Fourth Amendment inquiry is "whether [a] defendant has established a legitimate expectation of
t that the defendant "had not engaged in any business activity during the preceding six years").53 Accordingly, and consistent with the holdings in Ruiz and Broccolo, this Court should deny the severance motion. The defendant argues that the offenses are not connected because they involve different time periods.
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
of privacy rather than that of a third party." United States v. Payner, 447 U.S. 727, 731 (1980) (emphasis in original); see also United States v. Villegas, 899 F.2d 1324, 1333 (2d Cir. 1990). Ultimately, the Fourth Amendment inquiry is "whether [a] defendant has established a legitimate expectation of
t that the defendant "had not engaged in any business activity during the preceding six years").53 Accordingly, and consistent with the holdings in Ruiz and Broccolo, this Court should deny the severance motion. The defendant argues that the offenses are not connected because they involve different time periods.
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
of privacy rather than that of a third party." United States v. Payner, 447 U.S. 727, 731 (1980) (emphasis in original); see also United States v. Villegas, 899 F.2d 1324, 1333 (2d Cir. 1990). Ultimately, the Fourth Amendment inquiry is "whether [a] defendant has established a legitimate expectation of
t that the defendant "had not engaged in any business activity during the preceding six years").53 Accordingly, and consistent with the holdings in Ruiz and Broccolo, this Court should deny the severance motion. The defendant argues that the offenses are not connected because they involve different time periods.
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
of privacy rather than that of a third party." United States v. Payner, 447 U.S. 727, 731 (1980) (emphasis in original); see also United States v. Villegas, 899 F.2d 1324, 1333 (2d Cir. 1990). Ultimately, the Fourth Amendment inquiry is "whether [a] defendant has established a legitimate expectation of
t that the defendant "had not engaged in any business activity during the preceding six years").53 Accordingly, and consistent with the holdings in Ruiz and Broccolo, this Court should deny the severance motion. The defendant argues that the offenses are not connected because they involve different time periods.
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (258)
Entities connected to both Villegas and Ruiz and Broccolo
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON17 w/ Villegas·5 w/ Ruiz
Bradley Edwards
PERSON15 w/ Villegas·5 w/ Ruiz
the Southern District
LOCATION12 w/ Villegas·5 w/ Ruiz
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON11 w/ Villegas·5 w/ Ruiz
United States
LOCATION11 w/ Villegas·5 w/ Ruiz
George Mitchell
PERSON10 w/ Villegas·5 w/ Ruiz
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON11 w/ Villegas·4 w/ Ruiz
Bronx
LOCATION10 w/ Villegas·5 w/ Ruiz
MW
Martin Weinberg
PERSON10 w/ Villegas·5 w/ Ruiz
MF
Maria Farmer
PERSON11 w/ Villegas·4 w/ Ruiz
Anderson
PERSON10 w/ Villegas·5 w/ Ruiz
Gillette
ORGANIZATION10 w/ Villegas·5 w/ Ruiz
Kendall Coffey
PERSON10 w/ Villegas·5 w/ Ruiz
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION10 w/ Villegas·5 w/ Ruiz
Bill Richardson
PERSON10 w/ Villegas·5 w/ Ruiz
Towne
LOCATION9 w/ Villegas·5 w/ Ruiz
David Boies
PERSON9 w/ Villegas·5 w/ Ruiz
Colorado
LOCATION9 w/ Villegas·5 w/ Ruiz
Oregon
LOCATION9 w/ Villegas·5 w/ Ruiz
Hastings
PERSON9 w/ Villegas·5 w/ Ruiz