Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
of privacy rather than that of a third party." United States v. Payner, 447 U.S. 727, 731 (1980) (emphasis in original); see also United States v. Villegas, 899 F.2d 1324, 1333 (2d Cir. 1990). Ultimately, the Fourth Amendment inquiry is "whether [a] defendant has established a legitimate expectation of
ine[d] Ms. Maxwell's invitation to reconsider its order" and noted that the defendant had both filed a suppression motion and available tools under the Federal Rules of Evidence and Procedure. (See 15 Civ. 7433 (LAP), Dkt. No. 1211 at 3, 5). The portion of the July 2016 deposition transcript that forms the basis of Count Six that has been
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
of privacy rather than that of a third party." United States v. Payner, 447 U.S. 727, 731 (1980) (emphasis in original); see also United States v. Villegas, 899 F.2d 1324, 1333 (2d Cir. 1990). Ultimately, the Fourth Amendment inquiry is "whether [a] defendant has established a legitimate expectation of
ine[d] Ms. Maxwell's invitation to reconsider its order" and noted that the defendant had both filed a suppression motion and available tools under the Federal Rules of Evidence and Procedure. (See 15 Civ. 7433 (LAP), Dkt. No. 1211 at 3, 5). The portion of the July 2016 deposition transcript that forms the basis of Count Six that has been
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
of privacy rather than that of a third party." United States v. Payner, 447 U.S. 727, 731 (1980) (emphasis in original); see also United States v. Villegas, 899 F.2d 1324, 1333 (2d Cir. 1990). Ultimately, the Fourth Amendment inquiry is "whether [a] defendant has established a legitimate expectation of
ine[d] Ms. Maxwell's invitation to reconsider its order" and noted that the defendant had both filed a suppression motion and available tools under the Federal Rules of Evidence and Procedure. (See 15 Civ. 7433 (LAP), Dkt. No. 1211 at 3, 5). The portion of the July 2016 deposition transcript that forms the basis of Count Six that has been
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
of privacy rather than that of a third party." United States v. Payner, 447 U.S. 727, 731 (1980) (emphasis in original); see also United States v. Villegas, 899 F.2d 1324, 1333 (2d Cir. 1990). Ultimately, the Fourth Amendment inquiry is "whether [a] defendant has established a legitimate expectation of
ine[d] Ms. Maxwell's invitation to reconsider its order" and noted that the defendant had both filed a suppression motion and available tools under the Federal Rules of Evidence and Procedure. (See 15 Civ. 7433 (LAP), Dkt. No. 1211 at 3, 5). The portion of the July 2016 deposition transcript that forms the basis of Count Six that has been
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (258)
Entities connected to both Villegas and the Federal Rules of Evidence and Procedure
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON17 w/ Villegas·5 w/ the
Bradley Edwards
PERSON15 w/ Villegas·5 w/ the
the Southern District
LOCATION12 w/ Villegas·5 w/ the
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON11 w/ Villegas·5 w/ the
United States
LOCATION11 w/ Villegas·5 w/ the
George Mitchell
PERSON10 w/ Villegas·5 w/ the
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON11 w/ Villegas·4 w/ the
Bronx
LOCATION10 w/ Villegas·5 w/ the
MW
Martin Weinberg
PERSON10 w/ Villegas·5 w/ the
MF
Maria Farmer
PERSON11 w/ Villegas·4 w/ the
Anderson
PERSON10 w/ Villegas·5 w/ the
Gillette
ORGANIZATION10 w/ Villegas·5 w/ the
Kendall Coffey
PERSON10 w/ Villegas·5 w/ the
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION10 w/ Villegas·5 w/ the
Bill Richardson
PERSON10 w/ Villegas·5 w/ the
Towne
LOCATION9 w/ Villegas·5 w/ the
David Boies
PERSON9 w/ Villegas·5 w/ the
Colorado
LOCATION9 w/ Villegas·5 w/ the
Oregon
LOCATION9 w/ Villegas·5 w/ the
Hastings
PERSON9 w/ Villegas·5 w/ the