Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
of privacy rather than that of a third party." United States v. Payner, 447 U.S. 727, 731 (1980) (emphasis in original); see also United States v. Villegas, 899 F.2d 1324, 1333 (2d Cir. 1990). Ultimately, the Fourth Amendment inquiry is "whether [a] defendant has established a legitimate expectation of
ing concealment or "cover-ups" were not obviously within the scope of the charged conspiracy to defraud the United States by impairing and impeding the Immigration and Naturalization Service. Id. at 20, 24-26. Although the Court denied the motion to strike the alleged surplusage, it ordered the prosecution to provide a bill of particula
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
of privacy rather than that of a third party." United States v. Payner, 447 U.S. 727, 731 (1980) (emphasis in original); see also United States v. Villegas, 899 F.2d 1324, 1333 (2d Cir. 1990). Ultimately, the Fourth Amendment inquiry is "whether [a] defendant has established a legitimate expectation of
ing concealment or "cover-ups" were not obviously within the scope of the charged conspiracy to defraud the United States by impairing and impeding the Immigration and Naturalization Service. Id. at 20, 24-26. Although the Court denied the motion to strike the alleged surplusage, it ordered the prosecution to provide a bill of particula
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
of privacy rather than that of a third party." United States v. Payner, 447 U.S. 727, 731 (1980) (emphasis in original); see also United States v. Villegas, 899 F.2d 1324, 1333 (2d Cir. 1990). Ultimately, the Fourth Amendment inquiry is "whether [a] defendant has established a legitimate expectation of
ing concealment or "cover-ups" were not obviously within the scope of the charged conspiracy to defraud the United States by impairing and impeding the Immigration and Naturalization Service. Id. at 20, 24-26. Although the Court denied the motion to strike the alleged surplusage, it ordered the prosecution to provide a bill of particula
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
of privacy rather than that of a third party." United States v. Payner, 447 U.S. 727, 731 (1980) (emphasis in original); see also United States v. Villegas, 899 F.2d 1324, 1333 (2d Cir. 1990). Ultimately, the Fourth Amendment inquiry is "whether [a] defendant has established a legitimate expectation of
ing concealment or "cover-ups" were not obviously within the scope of the charged conspiracy to defraud the United States by impairing and impeding the Immigration and Naturalization Service. Id. at 20, 24-26. Although the Court denied the motion to strike the alleged surplusage, it ordered the prosecution to provide a bill of particula
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (266)
Entities connected to both Villegas and the Immigration and Naturalization Service
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON17 w/ Villegas·9 w/ the
Bradley Edwards
PERSON15 w/ Villegas·7 w/ the
United States
LOCATION11 w/ Villegas·10 w/ the
the Southern District
LOCATION12 w/ Villegas·5 w/ the
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON11 w/ Villegas·6 w/ the
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION10 w/ Villegas·7 w/ the
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON11 w/ Villegas·5 w/ the
Bill Richardson
PERSON10 w/ Villegas·5 w/ the
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON9 w/ Villegas·6 w/ the
Anderson
PERSON10 w/ Villegas·5 w/ the
Gillette
ORGANIZATION10 w/ Villegas·5 w/ the
MF
Maria Farmer
PERSON11 w/ Villegas·4 w/ the
Kendall Coffey
PERSON10 w/ Villegas·5 w/ the
MW
Martin Weinberg
PERSON10 w/ Villegas·5 w/ the
George Mitchell
PERSON10 w/ Villegas·5 w/ the
Bronx
LOCATION10 w/ Villegas·5 w/ the
North Carolina
LOCATION9 w/ Villegas·5 w/ the
Adriana Ross
PERSON9 w/ Villegas·5 w/ the
Julie K. Brown
PERSON9 w/ Villegas·5 w/ the
Michael Jackson
PERSON9 w/ Villegas·5 w/ the