Epstein Secrets

icial commentary in order to insure that Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant EPSTEIN receives a fair trial. See State ex. rd. Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. McIntosh, 340 So. 2d 904, 910 (Fla. 1976). Courts in Florida may take steps to protect against pretrial publicity. See Shepnard v. - 2 - EFTA00616237 CAS

r litigants and the media are permissible for good cause shown in order to assure a fair trial. See State ex. rel. Miami I Jerald Publishing Co. v. McIntosh, 340 So. 2d 904, 910 (Fla. 1976); see also Florida Freedom Newspapers, Inc. v. McCrary 520 So. 2d 32, 35 (Fla. 1988). 7. The Florida Supreme Court

ol and prohibit such extra- judicial commentary in order to insure that Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant EPSTEIN receives a fair trial. See State ex. rd. Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. McIntosh, 340 So. 2d 904, 910 (Fla. 1976). Courts in Florida may take steps to protect against pretrial publicity. See Shepnard v. - 2 - EFTA00

nd lawyers and/or litigants are permissible for good cause shown in order to assure a fair trial. See State ex. rel. Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. McIntosh, 340 So. 2d 904, 910 (Fla. 1976); see also Florida Freedom Newspapers, Inc. v. McCrary, 520 So. 2d 32, 35 (Fla. 1988). The Florida Supreme Court in

340 So. 2d 904, 910 (Fla. 1976); see also Florida Freedom Newspapers, Inc. v. McCrary, 520 So. 2d 32, 35 (Fla. 1988). The Florida Supreme Court in McIntosh recognized that restrictions on extrajudicial comment are within the power of the trial judge when it said: Limitation placed on lawyers, litigants

munications between the media and lawyers and/or litigants are permissible for good cause shown in order to assure a fair trial. See State ex. rel. Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. McIntosh, 340 So. 2d 904, 910 (Fla. 1976); see also Florida Freedom Newspapers, Inc. v. McCrary, 520 So. 2d 32, 35 (Fla. 1988). The Florida Supr

So. 2d 904, 910 (Fla. 1976); see also Florida Freedom Newspapers. Inc. v, McCrary, 520 So. 2d 32, 35 (Fla. 1988). 7. The Florida Supreme Court in McIntosh recognized that restrictions on extra- judicial comment are within the power of the trial judge when it said: Limitation placed on lawyers, litigant

cial commentary in order to insure that Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant EPSTEIN receives a fair trial. See Slide cx. rel. Miami Herald Publishing Co, v. McIntosh, 340 So. 2d 904, 910 (Fla. 1976). Cowls in Florida may take steps to protect against pretrial publicity. See Sheppard v - 2 - EFTA00599555 CASE

mmunications between lawyers and/or litigants and the media are permissible for good cause shown in order to assure a fair trial. See $tate ex. rel. Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. Mslntosh 340 So. 2d 904, 910 (Fla. 1976); see also Florida Freedom Newspapers. Inc. v, McCrary, 520 So. 2d 32, 35 (Fla. 1988). 7. The Florida

nd lawyers and/or litigants are permissible for good cause shown in order to assure a fair trial. See State ex. rel. Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. McIntosh, 340 So. 2d 904, 910 (Fla. 1976); see also Florida Freedom Newspapers. Inc. v. McCrary, 520 So. 2d 32, 35 (Fla. 1988). The Florida Supreme Court in

340 So. 2d 904, 910 (Fla. 1976); see also Florida Freedom Newspapers. Inc. v. McCrary, 520 So. 2d 32, 35 (Fla. 1988). The Florida Supreme Court in McIntosh recognized that restrictions on extrajudicial comment are within the power of the trial judge when it said: Limitation placed on lawyers, litigants

munications between the media and lawyers and/or litigants are permissible for good cause shown in order to assure a fair trial. See State ex. rel. Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. McIntosh, 340 So. 2d 904, 910 (Fla. 1976); see also Florida Freedom Newspapers. Inc. v. McCrary, 520 So. 2d 32, 35 (Fla. 1988). The Florida Supr

ves a fair trial. See Sheppard v. Maxwell, 384 U.S. 333, 348, 86 S. Ct. 1507, 16 L. Ed. 2d 600 (1966); State ex. reL Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. McIntosh, 340 So. 2d 904, 910 (Fla. 1976); Sentinel Commc'n Co. v. Watson, 615 So. 2d 768, 769 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993). The limitations imposed by a court on co

impediment to a court prohibiting counsel from making prejudicial statements that are intended for publication). 13. The Florida Supreme Court in McIntosh, 340 So. 2d at 910, recognized that restrictions on extrajudicial comment are within the power of the trial judge: Limitation placed on lawyers, li

o insure that Mr. Epstein receives a fair trial. See Sheppard v. Maxwell, 384 U.S. 333, 348, 86 S. Ct. 1507, 16 L. Ed. 2d 600 (1966); State ex. reL Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. McIntosh, 340 So. 2d 904, 910 (Fla. 1976); Sentinel Commc'n Co. v. Watson, 615 So. 2d 768, 769 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993). The limitations imposed by a

es a fair trial. See Sheppard v. Maxwell, 384 U.S. 333, 348, 86 S. Ct. 1507, 16 L. Ed. 2d 600 (1966); State ex. rel. Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. McIntosh, 340 So. 2d 904, 910 (Fla. 1976); Sentinel Commc'n - 4 - FOIVLER WHITE BURNER P.A. • ESPIRITO SANTO PLAZA, 1395 BRICKELL AVENUE, 14u , FLOOR. MIAM

impediment to a court prohibiting counsel from making prejudicial statements that are intended for publication). 13. The Florida Supreme Court in McIntosh, 340 So. 2d at 910, recognized that restrictions on extrajudicial comment are within the power of the trial judge: Limitation placed on lawyers, li

insure that Mr. Epstein receives a fair trial. See Sheppard v. Maxwell, 384 U.S. 333, 348, 86 S. Ct. 1507, 16 L. Ed. 2d 600 (1966); State ex. rel. Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. McIntosh, 340 So. 2d 904, 910 (Fla. 1976); Sentinel Commc'n - 4 - FOIVLER WHITE BURNER P.A. • ESPIRITO SANTO PLAZA, 1395 BRICKELL AVENUE, 14u ,

shed by U. S. Mail, postage prepaid, thisAjday of March, 2009 to Jack A. Goldberger, Esq.,/Bruce E. Reinhart, Esq., MI Douglas M. McIntosh, Esq., McIntosh, Sawran, Peitz & Cartaya, PA., MB Robert D. Critton, Jr., Michael J. Pike, By: Florida Bar No.: 089737 P.A. SENCR-S • q. EFTA00722704 IN

. 353 So.2d 547 (Fla. 1977). 9. Snipes v. West Flaciler Kennel Club, 105 So.2d 164 (Fla. 1958) EFTA00722695 v. Epstein Page 2 10. Buchanan v. Miami Herald Publishing Co., 230 So.2d 9, 12 (Fla. 1969) 11. Baisch v. Gallina, 346 F.3d 366, 373 (2nd Cir. 2003) 12. Fla. Stat. §772.101, et seq., commonly referred to as F

furnished by U. S. Mail, postage prepaid, thisdday of March, 2009 to Jack A. Goldberger, Esq.,/Bruce E. Reinhart, Esq. Douglas M. McIntosh, Esq., McIntosh, Sawran, Peitz & Cartaya, Robert D. Critton, Jr., Michael I Pike, LEOPOLD—KUVIN, PA. By: Florida Bar No.: 089737 EFTA00614434 IN THE CIRCUIT

53 So.2d 547 (Fla. 1977). 9. Snipes v. West Flaciler Kennel Club, 105 So.2d 164 (Fla. 1958) EFTA00614425 • v. Epstein Page 2 10. Buchanan v. Miami Herald Publishing Co., 230 So.2d 9, 12 (Fla. 1969) 11. Baisch v. Gallina, 346 F.3d 366, 373 (2nd Cir. 2003) 12. Fla. Stat. §772.101, et seq., commonly referred to as F