Epstein Secrets

icial commentary in order to insure that Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant EPSTEIN receives a fair trial. See State ex. rd. Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. McIntosh, 340 So. 2d 904, 910 (Fla. 1976). Courts in Florida may take steps to protect against pretrial publicity. See Shepnard v. - 2 - EFTA00616237 CAS

r litigants and the media are permissible for good cause shown in order to assure a fair trial. See State ex. rel. Miami I Jerald Publishing Co. v. McIntosh, 340 So. 2d 904, 910 (Fla. 1976); see also Florida Freedom Newspapers, Inc. v. McCrary 520 So. 2d 32, 35 (Fla. 1988). 7. The Florida Supreme Court

power to control professional conduct. State ex rel. Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. McIntosh, 340 So. 2d at 910. Thereafter, the Supreme Court in McCrary stated: "Prohibition on comment is an acceptable alternative to prior restraint." Florida Freedom Newspapers, Inc. v. McCrary, 520 So. 2d at 35-36 (

nd lawyers and/or litigants are permissible for good cause shown in order to assure a fair trial. See State ex. rel. Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. McIntosh, 340 So. 2d 904, 910 (Fla. 1976); see also Florida Freedom Newspapers, Inc. v. McCrary, 520 So. 2d 32, 35 (Fla. 1988). The Florida Supreme Court in

340 So. 2d 904, 910 (Fla. 1976); see also Florida Freedom Newspapers, Inc. v. McCrary, 520 So. 2d 32, 35 (Fla. 1988). The Florida Supreme Court in McIntosh recognized that restrictions on extrajudicial comment are within the power of the trial judge when it said: Limitation placed on lawyers, litigants

ir trial. See State ex. rel. Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. McIntosh, 340 So. 2d 904, 910 (Fla. 1976); see also Florida Freedom Newspapers, Inc. v. McCrary, 520 So. 2d 32, 35 (Fla. 1988). The Florida Supreme Court in McIntosh recognized that restrictions on extrajudicial comment are within the power of

So. 2d 904, 910 (Fla. 1976); see also Florida Freedom Newspapers. Inc. v, McCrary, 520 So. 2d 32, 35 (Fla. 1988). 7. The Florida Supreme Court in McIntosh recognized that restrictions on extra- judicial comment are within the power of the trial judge when it said: Limitation placed on lawyers, litigant

cial commentary in order to insure that Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant EPSTEIN receives a fair trial. See Slide cx. rel. Miami Herald Publishing Co, v. McIntosh, 340 So. 2d 904, 910 (Fla. 1976). Cowls in Florida may take steps to protect against pretrial publicity. See Sheppard v - 2 - EFTA00599555 CASE

air trial. See $tate ex. rel. Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. Mslntosh 340 So. 2d 904, 910 (Fla. 1976); see also Florida Freedom Newspapers. Inc. v, McCrary, 520 So. 2d 32, 35 (Fla. 1988). 7. The Florida Supreme Court in McIntosh recognized that restrictions on extra- judicial comment are within the pow

nd lawyers and/or litigants are permissible for good cause shown in order to assure a fair trial. See State ex. rel. Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. McIntosh, 340 So. 2d 904, 910 (Fla. 1976); see also Florida Freedom Newspapers. Inc. v. McCrary, 520 So. 2d 32, 35 (Fla. 1988). The Florida Supreme Court in

340 So. 2d 904, 910 (Fla. 1976); see also Florida Freedom Newspapers. Inc. v. McCrary, 520 So. 2d 32, 35 (Fla. 1988). The Florida Supreme Court in McIntosh recognized that restrictions on extrajudicial comment are within the power of the trial judge when it said: Limitation placed on lawyers, litigants

ir trial. See State ex. rel. Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. McIntosh, 340 So. 2d 904, 910 (Fla. 1976); see also Florida Freedom Newspapers. Inc. v. McCrary, 520 So. 2d 32, 35 (Fla. 1988). The Florida Supreme Court in McIntosh recognized that restrictions on extrajudicial comment are within the power of

ves a fair trial. See Sheppard v. Maxwell, 384 U.S. 333, 348, 86 S. Ct. 1507, 16 L. Ed. 2d 600 (1966); State ex. reL Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. McIntosh, 340 So. 2d 904, 910 (Fla. 1976); Sentinel Commc'n Co. v. Watson, 615 So. 2d 768, 769 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993). The limitations imposed by a court on co

impediment to a court prohibiting counsel from making prejudicial statements that are intended for publication). 13. The Florida Supreme Court in McIntosh, 340 So. 2d at 910, recognized that restrictions on extrajudicial comment are within the power of the trial judge: Limitation placed on lawyers, li

LAZA, 1395 BRICKELL AVENUE, 14m FLOOR. MIAMI, FLORIDA 33131* (305) 789-9200 EFTA00583815 CASE NO. 50 2009 CA 040800 XXXXMB AG Newspapers, Inc. v. McCrary, 520 So. 2d 32, 35 (Fla. 1988) (there is no constitutional impediment to a court prohibiting counsel from making prejudicial statements that are int

es a fair trial. See Sheppard v. Maxwell, 384 U.S. 333, 348, 86 S. Ct. 1507, 16 L. Ed. 2d 600 (1966); State ex. rel. Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. McIntosh, 340 So. 2d 904, 910 (Fla. 1976); Sentinel Commc'n - 4 - FOIVLER WHITE BURNER P.A. • ESPIRITO SANTO PLAZA, 1395 BRICKELL AVENUE, 14u , FLOOR. MIAM

impediment to a court prohibiting counsel from making prejudicial statements that are intended for publication). 13. The Florida Supreme Court in McIntosh, 340 So. 2d at 910, recognized that restrictions on extrajudicial comment are within the power of the trial judge: Limitation placed on lawyers, li

he media are permissible for good cause shown in order to assure a fair trial. See McIntosh, 340 So. 2d at 910; Florida Freedom Newspapers, Inc. v. McCrary, 520 So. 2d 32, 35 (Fla. 1988) (there is no constitutional impediment to a court prohibiting counsel from making prejudicial statements that are int