Epstein Secrets

terpretation or construction in Florida is set forth in A.R. Douglass, Inc., v. McRainey, 137 So. 157 (Fla. 1931): The intention and meaning of the Legislature must primarily be determined from the language of the statute itself and not from conjectures aliunde. When the language of the statute is clear an

Case 9:09-cv-80591-KAM Document 56 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/26/2009 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 101, CASE NO.: 09-CV-80591-MARRAJJOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. PLAINTIFF JANE DOE NO. 101'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTI

ation was made, and provided such person no longer meets the criteria for registration as a sexual offender under the laws of this state. (12) The Legislature finds that sexual offenders, especially those who have committed offenses against minors, often pose a high risk of engaging in sexual offenses oven

Docket 08)18:2008 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-80804-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE, a/k/a, JANE DOE NO. I, Plaintiff, VS. JEFFREY EPSTEIN and Defendants. MOTION TO REMAND Plaintiff Jane Doe moves the Court to remand this action to state court fo

ation was made, and provided such person no longer moots the criteria for registration as a sexual offender under the laws of this state. (12) The Legislature finds that sexual offenders, ospoclally those who have committed offenses against minors, often pose a high risk of engaging in sexual offenses oven

ed FLSD Docket 10/03/.. J8 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA NO. 08-80804-OV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE, a/k/a JANE DOE NO. 1, Plaintiff, 1. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, , and Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER REMANDING CASE TO STATE COURT THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Plainti

ation was made, and provided such person no longer meets the criteria for registration as a sexual offender under the laws of this state. (12) The Legislature finds that sexual offenders, especially those who haw committed offenses against minors, often pose a high risk of engaging in sexual offenses even

R, individually, Plaintiffs, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. PLAINTIFFS' MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS PENDING JANE DOE NO. 1 REACHING AGE OF MAJORITY Plaintiffs, Jane Doe No. 1, by and through Jane Doe's Father as parent and natural guardian, and Jane Doe's Father and