Back to Network
5
Shared Docs
5
Same-Page
5 / 5
Mentions
Document Mentions (5 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
o use them for purposes of sexual massages? MR. PAGLIUCA: Objection to the form and foundation. A. Can yo
amenable to multiple meanings, or that an answer "might generate a number of different interpretations." Lighte, 782 F.2d at 375; United States v. Strohm, 671 F.3d 1173, 1178 (10th Cir. 2011) ("Simply plumbing a question for post hoc ambiguity will not defeat a perjury conviction where the evidence de
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
o use them for purposes of sexual massages? MR. PAGLIUCA: Objection to the form and foundation. A. Can yo
amenable to multiple meanings, or that an answer "might generate a number of different interpretations." Lighte, 782 F.2d at 375; United States v. Strohm, 671 F.3d 1173, 1178 (10th Cir. 2011) ("Simply plumbing a question for post hoc ambiguity will not defeat a perjury conviction where the evidence de
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
o use them for purposes of sexual massages? MR. PAGLIUCA: Objection to the form and foundation. A. Can yo
amenable to multiple meanings, or that an answer "might generate a number of different interpretations." Lighte, 782 F.2d at 375; United States v. Strohm, 671 F.3d 1173, 1178 (10th Cir. 2011) ("Simply plumbing a question for post hoc ambiguity will not defeat a perjury conviction where the evidence de
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
o use them for purposes of sexual massages? MR. PAGLIUCA: Objection to the form and foundation. 123 EFTA
e amenable to multiple meanings, or that an answer "might generate a number of different interpretations." Lighte, 782 F.2d at 375; United States v. Strohm, 671 F.3d 1173, 1178 (10th Cir. 2011) ("Simply plumbing a question for post hoc ambiguity will not defeat a perjury conviction where the evidence d
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
o use them for purposes of sexual massages? MR. PAGLIUCA: Objection to the form and foundation. A. Can yo
amenable to multiple meanings, or that an answer "might generate a number of different interpretations." Lighte, 782 F.2d at 375; United States v. Strohm, 671 F.3d 1173, 1178 (10th Cir. 2011) ("Simply plumbing a question for post hoc ambiguity will not defeat a perjury conviction where the evidence de
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (992)
Entities connected to both Jeffrey Pagliuca and Strohm
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON872 w/ Jeffrey·25 w/ Strohm
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON577 w/ Jeffrey·46 w/ Strohm
Michael Cohen
PERSON489 w/ Jeffrey·19 w/ Strohm
Denver
LOCATION383 w/ Jeffrey·18 w/ Strohm
Prince Andrew
PERSON348 w/ Jeffrey·37 w/ Strohm
Southern District
LOCATION326 w/ Jeffrey·2 w/ Strohm
Colorado
LOCATION185 w/ Jeffrey·38 w/ Strohm
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION109 w/ Jeffrey·40 w/ Strohm
David Boies
PERSON120 w/ Jeffrey·10 w/ Strohm
United States
LOCATION93 w/ Jeffrey·34 w/ Strohm
Bradley Edwards
PERSON96 w/ Jeffrey·16 w/ Strohm
the Southern District
LOCATION81 w/ Jeffrey·22 w/ Strohm
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON53 w/ Jeffrey·36 w/ Strohm
Julie K. Brown
PERSON51 w/ Jeffrey·36 w/ Strohm
Stephen Hawking
PERSON55 w/ Jeffrey·30 w/ Strohm
Bronx
LOCATION69 w/ Jeffrey·10 w/ Strohm
Audrey Strauss
PERSON72 w/ Jeffrey·6 w/ Strohm
MF
Maria Farmer
PERSON44 w/ Jeffrey·29 w/ Strohm
FBI
ORGANIZATION42 w/ Jeffrey·28 w/ Strohm
LB
Leon Black
PERSON37 w/ Jeffrey·32 w/ Strohm