4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
th 13 The Maxwell Protective Order, despite the angst it is now causing, is unremarkable in form and function. Like many protective orders, Judge Sweet entered the Maxwell Protective Order in 2016 to "protect the discovery and dissemination of confidential information or information that will impro
gnated them CONFIDENTIAL or, alternatively, destroyed. (Id. 1 12.) 3 EFTA00074892 casgan et43g4.9kftneDiAgrAeAFIV/P4tEheif6 V- ga ef41th 13 2. Cooper & Kirk's Possession of the Maxwell Materials Before Dershowitz's 23 oral argument getting to the heart of the request, the Court was troubled to that re
8. In part, Ms. Maxwell needed information concerning any such investigation to assess "the impact on any 5th Amendment privilege." Id. at 8. Judge Sweet denied that motion. The day before Ms. Maxwell's deposition, the Court ordered that "[a]ny materials that the plaintiff has with respect to any cri
former counsel, Boies Schiller Flexner, various discovery materials that were subject to the Protective Order. EXHIBYI' 2 at 4. The Court rejected Cooper & Kirk's suggestion that it properly was a recipient of the material: [W]hatever Cooper & Kirk's intentions in requesting and obtaining the Maxwell material
In part, Ms. Maxwell needed information concerning any such investigation to assess "the impact on any 5th Amendment privilege." IS at 2, 4-5. Judge Sweet denied that motion. The day before Ms. Maxwell's deposition, the Court ordered that "[a]ny materials that the plaintiff has with respect to any cri
's former counsel, Boies Schiller Flexner, various discovery materials that were subject to the Protective Order. Doc.1071 at 4. The Court rejected Cooper & Kirk's suggestion that it properly was a recipient of the material: [W]hatever Cooper & Kirk's intentions in requesting and obtaining the Maxwell material
n part, Ms. Maxwell needed information concerning any such investigation to assess "the impact on any 5th Amendment privilege." Id. at 2, 4-5. Judge Sweet denied that motion. The day before Ms. Maxwell's deposition, the Court ordered that "[a]ny materials that the plaintiff has with respect to any cri
's former counsel, Boies Schiller Fierier, various discovery materials that were subject to the Protective Order. Doc.1071 at 4. The Court rejected Cooper & Kirk's suggestion that it properly was a recipient of the material: [W]hatever Cooper & Kirk's intentions in requesting and obtaining the Maxwell material
Entities connected to both Sweet and Cooper & Kirk's

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON
David Boies
PERSON
Julie K. Brown
PERSON
Virginia Giuffre
PERSONSigrid McCawley
PERSON
George W. Bush
PERSON
Bradley Edwards
PERSON
United States
LOCATION
Alan Dershowitz
PERSONMartindell
PERSON
Colorado
LOCATIONLoretta A. Preska
PERSON
Denver
LOCATION
Boies Schiller
ORGANIZATION
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION
Cynthia Nixon
PERSONLaura Menninger
PERSON
Schiller
PERSON
Foreman
PERSON