Epstein Secrets

hat the Court deny the request for leave to file any motion regarding the protective order, as any such motion would be properly addressed to Judge Sweet—the Judge who entered the order in the first instance. Jane Doe 43 furthers requests that the Court deny the requested stay of briefmg on the Motion

FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. 425 NORTH ANDREWS AVENUE, SUITE 2 FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33301 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET DATE: July 17, 2017

eek? Thank you. Brad As of this writing, no response was received to this email. However, on November 8, 2017, Ms. Menninger appeared before Judge Sweet — in this Court — to argue a confidentiality issue on behalf of defendant Maxwell including arguments as to the type of protective order that should

ggests otherwise. Conclusion The motion for the Court to reconsider its order should be denied. Dated: November 13, 2017 Respectfully submitted, FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS&LEHRMAN, P.L. Is/ Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33

ant to the Court's exercise of its inherent supervisory powers. The documents at issue here relate to discovery motions previously decided by Judge Sweet, and so the Court SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 EFTA00076444 Case 20-2413, Document 44, 08/20/2020, 2913556, Page63 of 78 3

Meredith Schultz (Pro Hac Vice) Boles_ Schiller & Flexner LLP 401 E. David Boies Boles, Schiller & Flexner LLP Bradley J. Edwards (Pro Hac Vice) FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. Paul G. Cassell (Pro Hac Vice) S.J. Quinney College of Law University of Utah ' This daytime business