Epstein Secrets

York United States Courthouse New York, New York 10007 Re: In re Application to Unseal Civil Discovery Materials, USAO No. 2018R01618 Dear Judge Sweet: The Government writes respectfully in connection with its sealed application and proposed order pursuant to the All Writs Act, Title 28, United St

is a decision committed to the sound discretion of the trial court."' TheStreet.com, 273 F.3d at 231 (modification in original) (citing In re Agent Orange, 821 F.3d at 147) (additional citations omitted). Here, the parties in the Litigation explicitly contemplated the public disclosure of such informat

York United States Courthouse New York, New York 10007 Re: In re Application to Unseal Civil Discovery Materials, USAO No. 2018R01618 Dear Judge Sweet: The Government writes respectfully in connection with its sealed application and proposed order pursuant to the All Writs Act, Title 28, United St

r is a decision committed to the sound discretion of the trial court" TheStreet.com, 273 F.3d at 231 (modification in original) (citing In re Agent Orange, 821 F.3d at 147) (additional citations omitted). Here, the parties in the Litigation explicitly contemplated the public disclosure of such informat

York United States Courthouse New York, New York 10007 Re: In re Application to Unseal Civil Discovery Materials, USAO No. 2018R01618 Dear Judge Sweet: The Government writes respectfully in connection with its sealed application and proposed order pursuant to the All Writs Act, Title 28, United St

is a decision committed to the sound discretion of the trial court."' TheStreet.com, 273 F.3d at 231 (modification in original) (citing In re Agent Orange, 821 F.3d at 147) (additional citations omitted). Here, the parties in the Litigation explicitly contemplated the public disclosure of such informat

686 , To Be Filed Under Seal statutory and common law privacy concerns. (Dkt. No. 38 at 1.) Maxwell submitted a proposed form of order for Judge Sweet's consideration. (Dkt. No. 39-1.) Giuffre represented that she "[did] not oppose the entrance [sic] of a Protective Order in this case, but [did] o

e whenever discovery materials were filed with the court under seal. In re Agent Orange Prod. Liab. Litig., 821 F.2d 139, 148 (2d Cir. 1987) (Agent Orange). In recent years, however, the Second Circuit has relaxed the Rule 26(c) "good cause" showing for discovery materials that are never filed with th