3
Shared Docs
0
Same-Page
3 / 10
Mentions
Crime Victims' Rights During Criminal Investigations? Applying the Crime Victims' Rights Act Before Criminal Charges Are Filed
cccccccccesceessseesseesseesseeeseeessees 73 III. THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT’S UNPERSUASIVE POSITION .........0....00000- 75 A.
CVRA rights attach when an officer or employee of the Department of Justice or any other department or agency of the United S
ns 71 C. Courts Recognize That Crime Victims Have CVRA Rights Before Charging .........ccccccccccccccccccccccesceessseesseesseesseeeseeessees 73 III. THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT’S UNPERSUASIVE POSITION .........0....00000- 75 A. OLC’s Misreading of the CVRA’s Definition of “Victim” ........ 76 B. OLC’s Distortion of the CVRA’s
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014039 →hat potential charges will never be filed. The issue of pre-charging rights has most prominently surfaced in connection with federal cases. In 2010, the Department of Justice’s Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) weighed in on the issue and released a legal opinion arguing that victims of federal crimes have no CVRA rights during
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014040 →CRIMINAL LAW: CRIME VICTIMS' RIGHTS DURING CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS? APPLYING THE CRIME VICTIMS' RIGHTS ACT BEFORE CRIMINAL CHARGES ARE FILED
of 31 104 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 59, *75 II. The Justice Department's Unpersuasive Position Despite the CVRA's broad r
cifically directs that "officers and employees of the Department of Justice and other departments and agencies of the United
hat potential charges will never be filed. The issue of pre-charging rights has most prominently surfaced in connection with federal cases. In 2010, the Department of Justice's Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) weighed in on the issue and released a legal opinion arguing that victims of federal crimes have no CVRA rights during
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017605 →t covering the specific crimes affecting the victims. Citing Dean, the District Court for the Eastern District of New York agreed that the rights ® John W. Gillis & Douglas E. Beloof, The Next Step for a Maturing Victim Rights Movement: Enforcing Crime Victim Rights in the Courts, 33 McGeorge L. Rev. 689, 693 (
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017613 →ARTICLE: Recognizing Victims in the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure: Proposed Amendments in Light of the Crime Victims' Rights Act
ourt proceedings. Moreover, the CVRA directs that the Department of Justice and its investigative agencies "shall make their
yl) ("We authorized an appropriation of funds to assure ... that moneys would be made available to enhance the victim notification system, managed by the Department of Justice's Office for Victims of Crime, and the resources additionally to develop state-of-the-art systems for notifying crime victims of important statements o
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017731 →tion, Indigent in Civil Action, 52 A.L.R. 4th 1063 (1987 & Supp. 2004). 312 912 F. Supp. 1221 (D. Neb. 1995). w 3 Id. at 1229. w 4 See generally John W. Gillis & Douglas Beloof, The Next Step for a Maturing Victim Rights Movement: Enforcing Crime Victim Rights in the Courts, 33 McGeorge L. Rev. 689, 692 (200
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017760 →Entities connected to both John W. Gillis and Department of Justice

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
United States
LOCATION
Prince Andrew
PERSON
Alexander Acosta
PERSON
Bradley Edwards
PERSON
Bill Clinton
PERSONJane Doe
PERSONFederal Bureau of Prisons
ORGANIZATIONMaria Farmer
PERSON
A. Marie Villafana
PERSON
Paul Cassell
PERSON
Colorado
LOCATION
Michigan
LOCATION
Harvey Weinstein
PERSON
India
LOCATION
Louisiana
LOCATION
Eric Holder
PERSON
Salt Lake City
LOCATION
Ronald Reagan
PERSON
Michael Reiter
PERSON