3
Shared Docs
0
Same-Page
3 / 3
Mentions
Crime Victims' Rights During Criminal Investigations? Applying the Crime Victims' Rights Act Before Criminal Charges Are Filed
lder strenuously objecting to the Department’s conclusions. Senator Kyl directly stated his view that “[w]hen Congress enacted the ' Scott Campbell, Stephanie Roper, Wendy Preston, Louarna Gillis, and Nila Lynn Crime Victims’ Rights Act, Pub. L. No. 108-405, 118 Stat. 2260, 2261-65 (2004) (codified as amended at
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014040 →, 689 (1972)). 1© See, e.g., United States v. Alvarado, 440 F.3d 191, 196 (4th Cir. 2006). 7 OLC CVRA Rights Memo, supra note 2, at 14 n.15 (citing Hanrahan v. United States, 348 F.2d 363, 366 n.6 (D.C. Cir. 1965)),; see WAYNE R. LAFAVE ET AL., CRIMINAL PROCEDURE § 6.4(e), at 670 (3d ed. 2007) (“There is
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014069 →CRIMINAL LAW: CRIME VICTIMS' RIGHTS DURING CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS? APPLYING THE CRIME VICTIMS' RIGHTS ACT BEFORE CRIMINAL CHARGES ARE FILED
s have responded that because prosecutors never filed charges, government officials had no formal obligations to inform the girls. ' Scott Campbell, Stephanie Roper, Wendy Preston, Louarna Gillis, and Nila Lynn Crime Victims' Rights Act, Pub. L. No. 108-405, 178 Stat. 2260, 2261-65 (2004) (codified as amended at
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017605 →, 689 (1972)). 76 See, e.g., United States v. Alvarado, 440 F.3d 191, 196 (4th Cir. 2006). ” OLC CVRA Rights Memo, supra note 2, at 14 n.15 (citing Hanrahan v. United States, 348 F.2d 363, 366 n.6 (D.C. Cir. 1965)); see Wayne R. LaFave et al., Criminal Procedure § 6.4(e), at 670 (3d ed. 2007) ("There is a
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017624 →ARTICLE: Treating Crime Victims Fairly: Integrating Victims into the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
ctims' efforts to pass a constitutional amendment, sce Jon Kyl, Steven J. Twist & Stephen Higgins, On the Wings of Their Angels, the Scott Campbell, Stephanie Roper, Wendy Preseon, Louarna Gillis, and Nila Lynn Crime Victims' Rights Act, 9 Lewis & Clark L. Rev. 581, 583-91 (2005). 32 §.J. Res. 52, 104th Cong. (1
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017640 →ra Lyn Bassett, Recusal and the Supreme Court, 56 Hastings L.J_ 657, 678-79 (2005) (citing United States v. Will, 449 U.S. 200, 211-12 & n.12 (1980); Hanrahan v. Hampton, 446 U.S. 1301, 1301 (1980)). 255 Model R. Prof] Conduct 4.4(a) (2007); see also ABA Criminal Justice Study, Standard 4-4.3 (1993). 256
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017668 →Entities connected to both Stephanie Roper and Hanrahan

United States
LOCATION
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
Paul Cassell
PERSON
Bradley Edwards
PERSONJane Doe
PERSON
Harvey Weinstein
PERSONWendy Preston
PERSON
S.J. Quinney College of Law
ORGANIZATION
the University of Utah
ORGANIZATIONMaria Farmer
PERSONLouarna Gillis
PERSONSecond Circuit
ORGANIZATIONLeon Black
PERSON
E.O. Wilson
PERSON
Eric Holder
PERSONM. Turner
PERSON
Bill Clinton
PERSON
LexisNexis
ORGANIZATION
Louisiana
LOCATION