Epstein Secrets

nable right to confer with the attorney for the Government.” At least in the posture of this case (and we do not speculate on the © John W. Gillis & Douglas E. Beloof, The Next Step for a Maturing Victim Rights Movement: Enforcing Crime Victim Rights in the Courts, 33 MCGEORGE L. REV. 689, 693 (2002). 63 527 F.3d

heard at any hearing involving a plea. See id. § 24-4.1-302.5. 236 Mo. ANN. STAT. § 595.209(10) (West 2011). 237 OFFICE OF VICTIM-WITNESS ADvocacy, N.J. DEP’T of LAW & Pup. SAFETY, A CRIME VICTIM’S GUIDE TO THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM 4 (2d ed. 1997), see also N.J. Const. art. I, § 22. Compare 18 U.S.

ing) (internal quotations omitted). See generally Douglas E. Beloof, Paul G. Cassell & Steven J. Twist, Victims in Cr

8 See generally Beloof, Cassell & Twist, supra note 6, at 392-99 (reviewing caselaw on the victim's interest in venue decisions). 379-737 A.2d 55 (N.J. 1999), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 858 (2001). 380 Id. at 64-69. DAVID SCHOEN HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017681 --- PAGE BREAK --- Page 47 of 78 2007 Utah L. Re

Beloof, Cassell & Twist, supra note 15, at ch. 1; Douglas E. Beloof, The Third Wave of Crime Victims' Rights: Standin

right to change venue because it "is, in effect, to accord the defense a whole peremptory challenge against the entire community"). 212 737 A.2d 55 (N.J. 1999). DAVID SCHOEN HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017742 --- PAGE BREAK --- Page 29 of 52 2005 B.Y.U.L. Rev. 835, *884 account does not constitute error, prov