Epstein Secrets

al bank with branch offices in thirteen (13) states, including a branch office in Weston, Florida. The executive offices of TD Bank were located in Portland, Maine and Cherry Hill, New Jersey. Defendant ROTHSTEIN and RRA maintained approximately thirty-eight (38) bank accounts at TD Bank, which were uti

Epstein as well as the improper litigation tactics outlined above) occurred within a five-year time period. 58. As a direct and proximate result of ROTHSTEIN, EDWARDS and L.M.'s violations of §772.103, Fla. Stat., EPSTEIN has been injured. 59. Pursuant to §772.104(1), Fla. Stat., Plaintiff EPSTEIN is entitled to

al bank with branch offices in thirteen (13) states, including a branch office in Weston, Florida. The executive offices of TD Bank were located in Portland, Maine and Cherry Hill, New Jersey. Defendant ROTHSTEIN and RRA maintained approximately thirty-eight (38) bank accounts at TD Bank, which were uti

Epstein as well as the improper litigation tactics outlined above) occurred within a five-year time period. 58. As a direct and proximate result of ROTHSTEIN, EDWARDS and ■.'s violations of §772.103, Fla. Stat., EPSTEIN has been injured. 59. Pursuant to §772.104(1), Fla. Stat., Plaintiff EPSTEIN is entitled to th

mercial.bank with branch offices in thirteen (13) states, including a branch office in Weston, Florida1 e utive offices of TD Bank were located in Portland, Maine and Cherry Hill, Ne Defendant ROTHSTEIN and RRA maintained approximately thirty-eight (38) nk a ts at TD Bank, which were utilized during

Epstein as well as the improper litigation tactics outlined above) occurred within a five-year time period. 58. As a direct and proximate result of ROTHSTEIN, EDWARDS and L.M.'s violations of §772.103, Fla. Stat., EPSTEIN has been injured. 59. Pursuant to §772.104(1), Fla. Stat., Plaintiff EPSTEIN is entitled to

al bank with branch offices in thirteen (13) states, including a branch office in Weston, Florida. The executive offices of TD Bank were located in Portland, Maine and Cherry Hill; New Jersey. Defendant ROTHSTEIN and RRA maintained approximately thirty-eight (38) bank accounts at TD Bank, which were uti

TEIN, EDWARDS and L.M. possessed ulterior motives or purposes in exercising such illegal, improper, or perverted use of process. 72. As a result of ROTHSTEIN, EDWARDS and L.M.'s actions, EPSTEIN suffered damages. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff EPSTEIN respectfully demands the entry of a judgment for damages against all th