Epstein Secrets

d from defendant's computer. 2252A(a)(1) Not Consummated Showed up at meeting 210 month sentence remanded to be reconsidered in light of U.S v. Crosby, 397 F.3d 103 (2d Cir. 2005). 5 EFTA00224139 a SES FACILITY FACTS/COMMUNICATION CHARGaE . U.S. I Minnici, 128 Fed. Appx. 827 (2nd Cir. 2005

ial denied. No Information ***Conspiracy/ Pimps 77 EFTA00224211 COURT aCAS -. .. . lit FACILITY FACTS/COMMUNICATION CHARGE N.D. Ohio Chilleme I U.S.. 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25920 (N.D. Ohio 2006) Dismissed by 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38800 Internet Defendant believed he was communicating

from defendant's computer. 2252A(a)(1) Not Consummated Showed up at meeting 210 month sentence remanded to be reconsidered in light of U.S. v. Crosby, 397 F.3d 103 (2d Cir. 2005). 4 EFTA01729488 CO T1; ._,. .... . " • s4 ',:-FACIa .1:4(-O4cpivimoicAirpN: -ci.41014, U.S. v. Minnie!. Un

FTA01729558 COURT ' - ‘.,-: ' CAS ,7,-...k.. „ .1y- " • .., • _%.-L,..,--- • :.FAOIL .2 •MO A, :.1trCFStc 1.4,11,O4 • , "..; N.D. Ohio Chilleme v. U.S.. 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25920 (N.D. Ohio 2006) Dismissed by 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38800 Internet Defendant believed he was communicatin

rom defendant's computer. 2252A(a)( I ) Not Consummated Showed up at meeting 210 month sentence remanded to be reconsidered in light of U.S. v. Crosby, 397 F.3d 103 (2d Cir. 2005). 4 EFTA00079417 - • 1" ."- t....7 S..• MC 1‘,. , yr - . VI ' ^ MiN)l h 7 A a - . U.S. v. Minnici

d. 2422(6); 2423; 1956 No Information ***Conspiracy/ Pimps 74 EFTA00079487 COURT CASES FACILITY FACTS/COMMUNICATION CHARGE N.D. Ohio Chilleme v. U.S.. 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25920 (N.D. Ohio 2006) Dismissed by 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38800 Internet Defendant believed he was communicatin