Epstein Secrets

d from defendant's computer. 2252A(a)(1) Not Consummated Showed up at meeting 210 month sentence remanded to be reconsidered in light of U.S v. Crosby, 397 F.3d 103 (2d Cir. 2005). 5 EFTA00224139 a SES FACILITY FACTS/COMMUNICATION CHARGaE . U.S. I Minnici, 128 Fed. Appx. 827 (2nd Cir. 2005

., U.S. I Pisman, 443 F.3d 912 (7th Cir. 2006) (2423(b) conspiracy); U.S Pipkins, et al., 378 F.3d 1281 (11th Cir. 2004) (RICO conspiracy); U.S. ~ Hornaday, 392 F.3d 1306 (1 1 `11 Cir. 2004) (conspiracy charge was error); U.S. I. Jackson, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 336 9 (D. Neb. 2007) (state conspiracy char

from defendant's computer. 2252A(a)(1) Not Consummated Showed up at meeting 210 month sentence remanded to be reconsidered in light of U.S. v. Crosby, 397 F.3d 103 (2d Cir. 2005). 4 EFTA01729488 CO T1; ._,. .... . " • s4 ',:-FACIa .1:4(-O4cpivimoicAirpN: -ci.41014, U.S. v. Minnie!. Un

U.S. v. Pisman, 443 F.3d 912 (76 Cir. 2006) (2423(b) Conspiracy); U.S. v. Pipkins, et al., 378 F.3d 1281 (11th Cir. 2004) (RICO conspiracy); U.S. v. Hornaday, 392 F.3d 1306 (11" Cir. 2004) (conspiracy charge was error); EFTA01729485 U.S. v. Jackson, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33639 (D. Neb. 2007) (state cons

rom defendant's computer. 2252A(a)( I ) Not Consummated Showed up at meeting 210 month sentence remanded to be reconsidered in light of U.S. v. Crosby, 397 F.3d 103 (2d Cir. 2005). 4 EFTA00079417 - • 1" ."- t....7 S..• MC 1‘,. , yr - . VI ' ^ MiN)l h 7 A a - . U.S. v. Minnici

U.S. v. Pisman, 443 F.3d 912 (sr Cir. 2006) (2423(b) conspiracy); U.S. v. Pipkins, et al., 378 F.3d 1281 (11th Cir. 2004) (RICO conspiracy); U.S. v. Hornaday, 392 F.3d 1306 (11`" Cir. 2004) (conspiracy charge was error); EFTA00079414 U.S. v. Jackson. 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33639 (D. Neb. 2007) (state con