Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
an immunity agreement, we look to the terms of the agreement itself, determined by applying common law contractual principles."); United States v. Thompson, 25 F.3d 1558, 1562 (11th Cir. 1994) ("In determining the extent of immunity afforded a defendant under an immunity agreement, a court should apply
y erroneous construction of 18 U.S.C. § 3858(b) — and where rescission "would [have] restore[d] the defendant to the approximate status quo ante"); Craig v. People, 986 P.2d 951, 959-60, 961-93 (Colo. 1999) (holding that plea agreement made no unlawful promises, but concluding that court would not have been req
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
an immunity agreement, we look to the terms of the agreement itself, determined by applying common law contractual principles."); United States v. Thompson, 25 F.3d 1558, 1562 (11th Cir. 1994) ("In determining the extent of immunity afforded a defendant under an immunity agreement, a court should apply
y erroneous construction of 18 U.S.C. § 3858(b) — and where rescission "would [have] restore[d] the defendant to the approximate status quo ante"); Craig v. People, 986 P.2d 951, 959-60, 961-93 (Colo. 1999) (holding that plea agreement made no unlawful promises, but concluding that court would not have been req
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
an immunity agreement, we look to the terms of the agreement itself, determined by applying common law contractual principles."); United States v. Thompson, 25 F.3d 1558, 1562 (11th Cir. 1994) ("In determining the extent of immunity afforded a defendant under an immunity agreement, a court should apply
y erroneous construction of 18 U.S.C. § 3858(b) — and where rescission "would [have] restore[d] the defendant to the approximate status quo ante"); Craig v. People, 986 P.2d 951, 959-60, 961-93 (Colo. 1999) (holding that plea agreement made no unlawful promises, but concluding that court would not have been req
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
an immunity agreement, we look to the terms of the agreement itself, determined by applying common law contractual principles."); United States v. Thompson, 25 F.3d 1558, 1562 (11th Cir. 1994) ("In determining the extent of immunity afforded a defendant under an immunity agreement, a court should apply
y erroneous construction of 18 U.S.C. § 3858(b) — and where rescission "would [have] restore[d] the defendant to the approximate status quo ante"); Craig v. People, 986 P.2d 951, 959-60, 961-93 (Colo. 1999) (holding that plea agreement made no unlawful promises, but concluding that court would not have been req
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (212)
Entities connected to both Thompson and Craig v. People
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON193 w/ Thompson·16 w/ Craig
United States
LOCATION91 w/ Thompson·14 w/ Craig
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON86 w/ Thompson·14 w/ Craig
Prince Andrew
PERSON87 w/ Thompson·5 w/ Craig
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION83 w/ Thompson·9 w/ Craig
ET
Emmy Taylor
PERSON82 w/ Thompson·5 w/ Craig
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON80 w/ Thompson·6 w/ Craig
George W. Bush
PERSON74 w/ Thompson·11 w/ Craig
Donald Trump
PERSON78 w/ Thompson·3 w/ Craig
Julie K. Brown
PERSON71 w/ Thompson·2 w/ Craig
LB
Leon Black
PERSON68 w/ Thompson·4 w/ Craig
Joe Biden
PERSON64 w/ Thompson·5 w/ Craig
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON61 w/ Thompson·7 w/ Craig
Marc Rich
PERSON49 w/ Thompson·15 w/ Craig
the Southern District
LOCATION50 w/ Thompson·13 w/ Craig
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION60 w/ Thompson·2 w/ Craig
FBI
ORGANIZATION55 w/ Thompson·6 w/ Craig
Michael Jackson
PERSON56 w/ Thompson·2 w/ Craig
WA
Walker
PERSON40 w/ Thompson·16 w/ Craig
Bradley Edwards
PERSON42 w/ Thompson·14 w/ Craig