Epstein Secrets

litigation privilege barred the abuse of process claim, and (21 litigation privilege bared the malicious prosecution claim. Affirmed. Shepherd, C.J., filed specially concurring opinion. West Headnotes (4) Itl tit Process ti-Nature and Elements in General The elements of a cause of action for

ION OR WITHDRAWAL. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. Harold E. WOLFE, Jr., et al., Appellants, v. Jeffrey T. FOREMAN, et al., Appellees. No. 3D10-3055. I July 17, 2013. Synopsis Background: Partner in a limited liability company (LLC) brought abuse of process and malicious pros

and Alana Zorrilla-Gaston (West Palm Beach), for appellant. W.J. Barnes, P.A., and Jeff Barnes (Boca Raton), for appellees. JUDGES: Before SUAREZ, C.J., and SHEPHERD and SCALES, JJ. OPINION BY: SCALES OPINION r228J SCALES, J. Appellant, plaintiff below, Citibank, N.A., as trustee for the BSARM 20

nvoluntarily dismissing the Trust's foreclosure complaint post-trial. The trial court entered final judgment against the Trust based exclusively on Appellees' expert witness who testified at trial that the Trust was not, and never had been, the holder of the subject note. We reverse because the trial cour

and Alana Zorrilla-Gaston (West Palm Beach), for appellant. W.J. Barnes, P.A., and Jeff Barnes (Boca Raton), for appellees. JUDGES: Before SUAREZ, C.J., and SHEPHERD and SCALES, JJ. OPINION BY: SCALES OPINION r228J SCALES, J. Appellant, plaintiff below, Citibank, N.A., as trustee for the BSARM 20

nvoluntarily dismissing the Trust's foreclosure complaint post-trial. The trial court entered final judgment against the Trust based exclusively on Appellees' expert witness who testified at trial that the Trust was not, and never had been, the holder of the subject note. We reverse because the trial cour