Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
District to refrain from tampering with indictments."' United States v. Bin Laden, 91 F. Supp. 2d 600, 621 (S.D.N.Y. 2000) (quoting United States v. Jimenez, 824 F. Supp. 351, 369 (S.D.N.Y. 1993)). "Motions to strike surplusage from an indictment will be granted only where the challenged allegations are
n individual right and applies only where it results in appreciable deterrence." United States v. Eldred, 933 F.3d 110, 118 (2d Cir. 2019) (quoting Herring v. United States, 555 U.S. 135, 141 (2009)); see also Herring, 555 U.S. at 144 (concluding that "[t]o trigger the exclusionary rule, police conduct must be sufficie
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
District to refrain from tampering with indictments."' United States v. Bin Laden, 91 F. Supp. 2d 600, 621 (S.D.N.Y. 2000) (quoting United States v. Jimenez, 824 F. Supp. 351, 369 (S.D.N.Y. 1993)). "Motions to strike surplusage from an indictment will be granted only where the challenged allegations are
n individual right and applies only where it results in appreciable deterrence." United States v. Eldred, 933 F.3d 110, 118 (2d Cir. 2019) (quoting Herring v. United States, 555 U.S. 135, 141 (2009)); see also Herring, 555 U.S. at 144 (concluding that "[t]o trigger the exclusionary rule, police conduct must be sufficie
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
District to refrain from tampering with indictments."' United States v. Bin Laden, 91 F. Supp. 2d 600, 621 (S.D.N.Y. 2000) (quoting United States v. Jimenez, 824 F. Supp. 351, 369 (S.D.N.Y. 1993)). "Motions to strike surplusage from an indictment will be granted only where the challenged allegations are
n individual right and applies only where it results in appreciable deterrence." United States v. Eldred, 933 F.3d 110, 118 (2d Cir. 2019) (quoting Herring v. United States, 555 U.S. 135, 141 (2009)); see also Herring, 555 U.S. at 144 (concluding that "[t]o trigger the exclusionary rule, police conduct must be sufficie
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
District to refrain from tampering with indictments."' United States v. Bin Laden, 91 F. Supp. 2d 600, 621 (S.D.N.Y. 2000) (quoting United States v. Jimenez, 824 F. Supp. 351, 369 (S.D.N.Y. 1993)). "Motions to strike surplusage from an indictment will be granted only where the challenged allegations are
n individual right and applies only where it results in appreciable deterrence." United States v. Eldred, 933 F.3d 110, 118 (2d Cir. 2019) (quoting Herring v. United States, 555 U.S. 135, 141 (2009)); see also Herring, 555 U.S. at 144 (concluding that "[t]o trigger the exclusionary rule, police conduct must be sufficie
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (253)
Entities connected to both Jimenez and Herring v. United States
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON43 w/ Jimenez·4 w/ Herring
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON30 w/ Jimenez·4 w/ Herring
United States
LOCATION27 w/ Jimenez·4 w/ Herring
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION20 w/ Jimenez·4 w/ Herring
Colorado
LOCATION20 w/ Jimenez·4 w/ Herring
North Carolina
LOCATION19 w/ Jimenez·4 w/ Herring
Bill Richardson
PERSON19 w/ Jimenez·4 w/ Herring
Chris Tucker
PERSON19 w/ Jimenez·4 w/ Herring
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON20 w/ Jimenez·3 w/ Herring
WA
Walsh
PERSON18 w/ Jimenez·4 w/ Herring
TH
Thompson
PERSON18 w/ Jimenez·4 w/ Herring
Oregon
LOCATION17 w/ Jimenez·4 w/ Herring
the Second Circuit's
ORGANIZATION17 w/ Jimenez·4 w/ Herring
Julie K. Brown
PERSON17 w/ Jimenez·4 w/ Herring
Martinez
PERSON17 w/ Jimenez·4 w/ Herring
Michael Jackson
PERSON17 w/ Jimenez·4 w/ Herring
MF
Maria Farmer
PERSON18 w/ Jimenez·3 w/ Herring
Eric Schmidt
PERSON17 w/ Jimenez·4 w/ Herring
Michigan
LOCATION16 w/ Jimenez·4 w/ Herring
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON16 w/ Jimenez·4 w/ Herring