Epstein Secrets

214 F.3d 1058, 1068-69 (9th Cir.2000); James v. Jacobson, 6 F.3d 233, 238-39 (4th Cir.1993); EW v. New Yor

endant. ____________________________________/ JANE DOE, CASE NO.: 08- CV-80893-MARRA/JOHNSON P

It was a little bit bigger. Obviously it was 3 configured differently. Thin isn't a rectangular 4 office. I worked for Marty Fine and Bernie 4 Jacobson in Miami. They didn't have an open door / policy. • So their office was set up in the ➢ane way 9 as Rothstein? 10 Il 12 13 la 15 If 17

riod and say, You 25 know, I should have realized there was something that were being prosecuted on behalf of throe young 1 woman: M., B.N. and Jane Doe. And w➢ will refer to them when I talk to you about them in that ➢ame way, 4 referring to sham by those initial➢ and that 5 pseudonym. 4 Desc

rday morning and then taneously confessed to med he had just murdered his wi children — a confession the also made to an emergency nurse. Though Jacobson is a Medical Center, he is consid EFTA01711962 • F13-302 (Rec. 10-6-95) • - I - FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Dale 01 tramerMtwm 05/30120

Miami, FL 33132 • • PAUL. G. CASSELL Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law Telephone: 801-585-5202 [email protected] Re: Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 vs. United States, No. 09-80736 Dear Mr. Ferrer: We are writing to you personally on behalf of Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 in on

s, L., & Loftus, E.F. (2008) Lasting false beliefs and their behavioral consequences. Psychological Science, 19, 749-753 Sharman, S. J., Garry, M., Jacobson, J.A., Loftus, E. F. & Ditto, P.H. (2008) False memories for end- of-life decisions. Health Psychology. 27, 291-296. Laney, C., Fowler, N.B., Nelson

Balancing with the players stacked against you. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 365-366 (Book Review). Loftus, E.F. & Guyer, M. (2002) Who Abused Jane Doe?: The Hazards of the Single Case History. Skeptical Inquirer. Part I. Vol 26, #3 (May/June), Pp. 24-32. Loftus, E. F. & Guyer, M. J. (2002) Who Abu