Epstein Secrets

tional distress, anguish, shock, nervousness, pain and EFTA00729112 Doe v. Epstein Page No. 4 suffering) are not recoverable under RICO), citing Zimmerman v. HBO Affiliate Group, 834 F.2d 1163, 1169 (3d Cir. 1987)(congress intended RICO to exclude personal injuries). M. at 348. Plaintiff cannot argue

nd Magnum v. Archdiocese of Philadelphia, 253 Fed.Appx. 224 (3"1 Cir. 2007Xunderlying wrong of continued childhood sexual abuse brought against the Archdiocese did not allow for recovery under RICO). Moreover, despite Plaintiff's reaching arguments, she fails to cite any supporting case law or legislative a

tional distress, anguish, shock, nervousness, pain and EFTA00729107 Doe v. Epstein Page No. 4 suffering) are not recoverable under RICO), citing Zimmerman v. HBO Affiliate Group, 834 F.2d 1163, 1169 (3d Cir. 1987)(congress intended RICO to exclude personal injuries). M. at 348. Plaintiff cannot argue

nd Magnum v. Archdiocese of Philadelphia, 253 Fed.Appx. 224 (3"1 Cir. 2007Xunderlying wrong of continued childhood sexual abuse brought against the Archdiocese did not allow for recovery under RICO). Moreover, despite Plaintiff's reaching arguments, she fails to cite any supporting case law or legislative a

rial court's ruling — general damages (emotional distress, anguish, shock, nervousness, pain and suffering) are not recoverable under RICO), citing Zimmerman v. HBO Affiliate Group, 834 F.2d 1163, 1169 (3d Cir. 1987)(congress intended RICO to exclude personnel injuries). 14. at 348. In Connor v. Halifax

o Maanum v. Archdiocese of Philadelphia, 253 Fed.Appx. 224 (and Cir. 2007)(underlying wrong of continued childhood sexual abuse brought against the Archdiocese did not allow for recovery under RICO). Finally, even Florida's Fourth DCA confirms that in order to have a claim for RICO, there must be damage to