Back to Network
3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
3 / 3
Mentions
Document Mentions (3 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
n in certain tax proceedings to protect a taxpayer's identity), the CVRA also does not grant victims a right to intervene in court proceedings. See Brandt v. Gooding, 636 F.3d 124, 136 (4th Cir. 2011) ("[T]he CVRA's plain language makes no reference to intervention; the Act therefore grants no privile
y, rescission of an agreement is a remedy reserved to the parties to that agreement or those in contractual privity with them. See, e.g., 77tompkins v. Lir Joe Records, Inc., 476 F.3d 1294, 1315 (11th Cir. 2007) (holding that "the first requirement of a suit for rescission under Florida law" is "that the parties t
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
n in certain tax proceedings to protect a taxpayer's identity), the CVRA also does not grant victims a right to intervene in court proceedings. See Brandt v. Gooding, 636 F.3d 124, 136 (4th Cir. 2011) ("[T]he CVRA's plain language makes no reference to intervention; the Act therefore grants no privile
y, rescission of an agreement is a remedy reserved to the parties to that agreement or those in contractual privity with them. See, e.g., 77tompkins v. Lir Joe Records, Inc., 476 F.3d 1294, 1315 (11th Cir. 2007) (holding that "the first requirement of a suit for rescission under Florida law" is "that the parties t
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
n in certain tax proceedings to protect a taxpayer's identity), the CVRA also does not grant victims a right to intervene in court proceedings. See Brandt v. Gooding, 636 F.3d 124, 136 (4th Cir. 2011) ("[T]he CVRA's plain language makes no reference to intervention; the Act therefore grants no privile
y, rescission of an agreement is a remedy reserved to the parties to that agreement or those in contractual privity with them. See, e.g., 77tompkins v. Lir Joe Records, Inc., 476 F.3d 1294, 1315 (11th Cir. 2007) (holding that "the first requirement of a suit for rescission under Florida law" is "that the parties t
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (158)
Entities connected to both Brandt and v. Lir Joe Records
George W. Bush
PERSON21 w/ Brandt·3 w/ v.
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON19 w/ Brandt·3 w/ v.
United States
LOCATION14 w/ Brandt·3 w/ v.
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON12 w/ Brandt·3 w/ v.
Joe Biden
PERSON12 w/ Brandt·3 w/ v.
Alan Dershowitz
PERSON12 w/ Brandt·3 w/ v.
Michael Douglas
PERSON11 w/ Brandt·3 w/ v.
MF
Maria Farmer
PERSON11 w/ Brandt·3 w/ v.
Prince Charles
PERSON11 w/ Brandt·3 w/ v.
Marc Rich
PERSON10 w/ Brandt·3 w/ v.
ET
Emmy Taylor
PERSON9 w/ Brandt·3 w/ v.
Phoenix
LOCATION9 w/ Brandt·3 w/ v.
AP
Appleton
PERSON8 w/ Brandt·3 w/ v.
RU
Rubin
PERSON8 w/ Brandt·3 w/ v.
New York
LOCATION8 w/ Brandt·3 w/ v.
Hunter Biden
PERSON7 w/ Brandt·3 w/ v.
Bradley Edwards
PERSON6 w/ Brandt·3 w/ v.
TH
Thompson
PERSON6 w/ Brandt·3 w/ v.
NM
Nadia Marcinkova
PERSON6 w/ Brandt·3 w/ v.
Lee County
LOCATION5 w/ Brandt·3 w/ v.