Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
n in certain tax proceedings to protect a taxpayer's identity), the CVRA also does not grant victims a right to intervene in court proceedings. See Brandt v. Gooding, 636 F.3d 124, 136 (4th Cir. 2011) ("[T]he CVRA's plain language makes no reference to intervention; the Act therefore grants no privile
ng into a settlement agreement.")); United States v. Drier, 682 F. Supp. 2d 417, 421 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) (same); see further United States v. BP Prods. N. Am. Inc., 610 F. Supp. 2d 655, 727 (S.D. Tex. 2009) ("The purpose of the conferral right is not to give victims a right to approve or disapprove a proposed
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
n in certain tax proceedings to protect a taxpayer's identity), the CVRA also does not grant victims a right to intervene in court proceedings. See Brandt v. Gooding, 636 F.3d 124, 136 (4th Cir. 2011) ("[T]he CVRA's plain language makes no reference to intervention; the Act therefore grants no privile
ng into a settlement agreement.")); United States v. Drier, 682 F. Supp. 2d 417, 421 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) (same); see further United States v. BP Prods. N. Am. Inc., 610 F. Supp. 2d 655, 727 (S.D. Tex. 2009) ("The purpose of the conferral right is not to give victims a right to approve or disapprove a proposed
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
n in certain tax proceedings to protect a taxpayer's identity), the CVRA also does not grant victims a right to intervene in court proceedings. See Brandt v. Gooding, 636 F.3d 124, 136 (4th Cir. 2011) ("[T]he CVRA's plain language makes no reference to intervention; the Act therefore grants no privile
ng into a settlement agreement.")); United States v. Drier, 682 F. Supp. 2d 417, 421 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) (same); see further United States v. BP Prods. N. Am. Inc., 610 F. Supp. 2d 655, 727 (S.D. Tex. 2009) ("The purpose of the conferral right is not to give victims a right to approve or disapprove a proposed
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
n in certain tax proceedings to protect a taxpayer's identity), the CVRA also does not grant victims a right to intervene in court proceedings. See Brandt v. Gooding, 636 F.3d 124, 136 (4th Cir. 2011) ("[T]he CVRA's plain language makes no reference to intervention; the Act therefore grants no privile
ng into a settlement agreement.")); United States v. Drier, 682 F. Supp. 2d 417, 421 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) (same); see further United States v. BP Prods. N. Am. Inc., 610 F. Supp. 2d 655, 727 (S.D. Tex. 2009) ("The purpose of the conferral right is not to give victims a right to approve or disapprove a proposed
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (166)
Entities connected to both Brandt and N. Am. Inc.
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON19 w/ Brandt·8 w/ N.
George W. Bush
PERSON21 w/ Brandt·5 w/ N.
United States
LOCATION14 w/ Brandt·7 w/ N.
Alan Dershowitz
PERSON12 w/ Brandt·7 w/ N.
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON12 w/ Brandt·6 w/ N.
Joe Biden
PERSON12 w/ Brandt·6 w/ N.
MF
Maria Farmer
PERSON11 w/ Brandt·6 w/ N.
Prince Charles
PERSON11 w/ Brandt·6 w/ N.
Michael Douglas
PERSON11 w/ Brandt·5 w/ N.
Marc Rich
PERSON10 w/ Brandt·5 w/ N.
Phoenix
LOCATION9 w/ Brandt·5 w/ N.
ET
Emmy Taylor
PERSON9 w/ Brandt·5 w/ N.
New York
LOCATION8 w/ Brandt·5 w/ N.
Bradley Edwards
PERSON6 w/ Brandt·7 w/ N.
RU
Rubin
PERSON8 w/ Brandt·5 w/ N.
Hunter Biden
PERSON7 w/ Brandt·5 w/ N.
AP
Appleton
PERSON8 w/ Brandt·4 w/ N.
Paul Cassell
PERSON5 w/ Brandt·7 w/ N.
the Southern District
LOCATION5 w/ Brandt·6 w/ N.
TH
Thompson
PERSON6 w/ Brandt·5 w/ N.