Epstein Secrets

,. he-pfeduee44n-eamefa7 40711. Court's have observed that private documents collected during discovery are not judicial records. United States v. Anderson, 799 F.2d 1438, 1441 (11th Cir.1986). Thus, while EFTA00728120 the public may enjoy the right of access to "pleadings, docket entries, orders, aff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CIV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. Related cases: 08-80232, 08-08380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80993, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469,

jury to return a verdict for that party. If the evidence is merely colorable, or is not significantly probative, summary judgment may be granted." Anderson.. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 250, 106 S. Ct. 2505, 2511 (1986) (internal citations omitted). 3 EFTA00211720 and hoped that Epstein would

hat the Government is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, because it did not violate the CVRA rights of either petitioner. EFTA00211718 II. JANE DOE NO. 2 CANNOT INVOKE THE CVRA BECAUSE SHE OPENLY OPPOSED AND WAS HOSTILE TO THE PROSECUTION OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN Petitioners have not distinguished the

jury to return a verdict for that party. If the evidence is merely colorable, or is not significantly probative, summary judgment may be granted." Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 250, 106 S. Ct. 2505, 2511 (1986) (internal citations omitted). 3 EFTA00799827 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Docu

iolate the CVRA rights of either petitioner. EFTA00799825 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 408 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/06/2017 Page 2 of 32 II. JANE DOE NO. 2 CANNOT INVOKE THE CVRA BECAUSE SHE OPENLY OPPOSED AND WAS HOSTILE TO THE PROSECUTION OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN Petitioners have not distinguished the

nd her 29 anything like that. The only girl that I picked up from 24 name was Dr. -- she was a doctor of medicine -- Eva 25 the school wan 25 Anderson. And I really liked this girl. She was veil. (561) 832-7500 PROSE COURT REPORTING AGENCY, INC. FOIA Confidential Treatment Requested /Fed. R. ern.

Page 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE No.08•CV.80119•CIV•MARRAIJOIINSON JANE DOE NO. 2. Plaintiff. n. JEFFREY EPSTEIN. Defendant. Related cases: 08.10232. 0840360. 9840381 08.10994. 0640993. 0840811. 08.80893. 09.80169. 09.10

jury to return a verdict for that party. If the evidence is merely colorable, or is not significantly probative, summary judgment may be granted." Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 250, 106 S. Ct. 2505, 2511 (1986) (internal citations omitted). 3 EFTA00591464 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Docu

late the CVRA rights of either petitioner. EFTA00591462 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 401-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/02/2017 Page 3 of 33 II. JANE DOE NO. 2 CANNOT INVOKE THE CVRA BECAUSE SHE OPENLY OPPOSED AND WAS HOSTILE TO THE PROSECUTION OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN Petitioners have not distinguished the

y Sandra Townsend (401 Satc3ca0-c86e4b9f-8d01-ba2Obcae87de EFTA00181727 Page 179 1 A. Left. 2 Q. was no longer Mr. Epstein's -- Dr. Eva 3 Anderson was no longer Mr. Epstein's girlfriend, -- 4 A. That's correct. 5 Q. -- and a new girlfriend came in and that was 6 Ghislaine Maxwell? 7 A.

Page 81 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE No.08-CV-80119-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSQN JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, -vs- JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. Related cases: 08-80232, 08-80380, 98-80381, 08-80994, 08-80993, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469,

ENA RESPONSE 000454 3afc3catil-c868-4b9148d01-ba20bcae87de EFTA00101419 Page 179 1 A. Left. 2 Q. was no longer Mr. Epstein's -- Dr. Eva 3 Anderson was no longer Mr. Epstein's girlfriend, -- 4 A. That's correct. 5 Q. -- and a new girlfriend came in and that was 6 Ghislaine Maxwell? 7 A.

Page 81 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE No.08-CV-80119-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSQN JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, -vs- JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. Related cases: 08-80232, 08-80380, 98-80381, 08-80994, 08-80993, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469,