Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
6-CV-2242 (VEC), 2020 WL 1503452, at *6 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 30, 2020) (quoting 4 Weinstein's Federal Evidence § 702.03 (2019)); see also United States v. Mulder, 273 F.3d 91, 101 (2d Cir. 2001) (explaining that "the district court should not admit testimony that is 'directed solely to lay matters which a ju
he admission of such experts. A number of courts have admitted experts on the particular topic of grooming at issue here, a sample of which include the Seventh Circuit in United States v. Romero, 189 F.3d 576, 585 (7th Cir. 1999), the Fifth Circuit in United States v. Hitt, 473 F.3d 146, 158 (5th Cir. 2006), the N
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
6-CV-2242 (VEC), 2020 WL 1503452, at *6 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 30, 2020) (quoting 4 Weinstein's Federal Evidence § 702.03 (2019)); see also United States v. Mulder, 273 F.3d 91, 101 (2d Cir. 2001) (explaining that "the district court should not admit testimony that is 'directed solely to lay matters which a ju
he admission of such experts. A number of courts have admitted experts on the particular topic of grooming at issue here, a sample of which include the Seventh Circuit in United States v. Romero, 189 F.3d 576, 585 (7th Cir. 1999), the Fifth Circuit in United States v. Hitt, 473 F.3d 146, 158 (5th Cir. 2006), the N
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
6-CV-2242 (VEC), 2020 WL 1503452, at *6 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 30, 2020) (quoting 4 Weinstein's Federal Evidence § 702.03 (2019)); see also United States v. Mulder, 273 F.3d 91, 101 (2d Cir. 2001) (explaining that "the district court should not admit testimony that is 'directed solely to lay matters which a ju
he admission of such experts. A number of courts have admitted experts on the particular topic of grooming at issue here, a sample of which include the Seventh Circuit in United States v. Romero, 189 F.3d 576, 585 (7th Cir. 1999), the Fifth Circuit in United States v. Hitt, 473 F.3d 146, 158 (5th Cir. 2006), the N
Sponsored
2 mentions
Page EFTA00016474
he admission of such experts. A number of courts have admitted experts on the particular topic of grooming at issue here, a sample of which include the Seventh Circuit in United States v. Romero, 189 F.3d 576, 585 (7th Cir. 1999), the Fifth Circuit in United States v. Hitt, 473 F.3d 146, 158 (5th Cir. 2006), the N
Page: EFTA00016474 →Page EFTA00016478
6-CV-2242 (VEC), 2020 WL 1503452, at *6 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 30, 2020) (quoting 4 Weinstein's Federal Evidence § 702.03 (2019)); see also United States v. Mulder, 273 F.3d 91, 101 (2d Cir. 2001) (explaining that "the district court should not admit testimony that is 'directed solely to lay matters which a ju
Page: EFTA00016478 →Sponsored
Mutual Connections (83)
Entities connected to both Mulder and the Seventh Circuit
United States
LOCATION16 w/ Mulder·22 w/ the
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON16 w/ Mulder·22 w/ the
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION13 w/ Mulder·21 w/ the
Julie K. Brown
PERSON14 w/ Mulder·9 w/ the
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON15 w/ Mulder·7 w/ the
George W. Bush
PERSON12 w/ Mulder·9 w/ the
MW
Martin Weinberg
PERSON11 w/ Mulder·9 w/ the
the Southern District
LOCATION10 w/ Mulder·10 w/ the
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON14 w/ Mulder·5 w/ the
Bradley Edwards
PERSON11 w/ Mulder·7 w/ the
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION10 w/ Mulder·7 w/ the
the Second Circuit's
ORGANIZATION13 w/ Mulder·4 w/ the
Carpenter
PERSON11 w/ Mulder·5 w/ the
MF
Maria Farmer
PERSON11 w/ Mulder·4 w/ the
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Mulder·10 w/ the
CM
Colleen McMahon
PERSON10 w/ Mulder·4 w/ the
Anderson
PERSON11 w/ Mulder·3 w/ the
Colorado
LOCATION10 w/ Mulder·4 w/ the
Eric Schmidt
PERSON11 w/ Mulder·2 w/ the
Bill Richardson
PERSON11 w/ Mulder·2 w/ the