Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
6-CV-2242 (VEC), 2020 WL 1503452, at *6 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 30, 2020) (quoting 4 Weinstein's Federal Evidence § 702.03 (2019)); see also United States v. Mulder, 273 F.3d 91, 101 (2d Cir. 2001) (explaining that "the district court should not admit testimony that is 'directed solely to lay matters which a ju
mony, finding it to be "quite common[ ]" and accepted in the academic literature. 385 F. Supp. 3d at 263. Identical testimony was admitted by Judge Furman in United States v. Dupigny, No. 18- Cr.-528 (JMF) (S.D.N.Y. 2019), Dkt. No. 198 at 27, by Judge Engelmayer in United States v. Randall, 19 Cr. 131
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
6-CV-2242 (VEC), 2020 WL 1503452, at *6 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 30, 2020) (quoting 4 Weinstein's Federal Evidence § 702.03 (2019)); see also United States v. Mulder, 273 F.3d 91, 101 (2d Cir. 2001) (explaining that "the district court should not admit testimony that is 'directed solely to lay matters which a ju
mony, finding it to be "quite common[ ]" and accepted in the academic literature. 385 F. Supp. 3d at 263. Identical testimony was admitted by Judge Furman in United States v. Dupigny, No. 18- Cr.-528 (JMF) (S.D.N.Y. 2019), Dkt. No. 198 at 27, by Judge Engelmayer in United States v. Randall, 19 Cr. 131
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
6-CV-2242 (VEC), 2020 WL 1503452, at *6 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 30, 2020) (quoting 4 Weinstein's Federal Evidence § 702.03 (2019)); see also United States v. Mulder, 273 F.3d 91, 101 (2d Cir. 2001) (explaining that "the district court should not admit testimony that is 'directed solely to lay matters which a ju
mony, finding it to be "quite common[ ]" and accepted in the academic literature. 385 F. Supp. 3d at 263. Identical testimony was admitted by Judge Furman in United States v. Dupigny, No. 18- Cr.-528 (JMF) (S.D.N.Y. 2019), Dkt. No. 198 at 27, by Judge Engelmayer in United States v. Randall, 19 Cr. 131
Sponsored
2 mentions
Page EFTA00016474
mony, finding it to be "quite common[ ]" and accepted in the academic literature. 385 F. Supp. 3d at 263. Identical testimony was admitted by Judge Furman in United States v. Dupigny, No. 18- Cr.-528 (JMF) (S.D.N.Y. 2019), Dkt. No. 198 at 27, by Judge Engelmayer in United States v. Randall, 19 Cr. 131
Page: EFTA00016474 →Page EFTA00016478
6-CV-2242 (VEC), 2020 WL 1503452, at *6 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 30, 2020) (quoting 4 Weinstein's Federal Evidence § 702.03 (2019)); see also United States v. Mulder, 273 F.3d 91, 101 (2d Cir. 2001) (explaining that "the district court should not admit testimony that is 'directed solely to lay matters which a ju
Page: EFTA00016478 →Sponsored
Mutual Connections (89)
Entities connected to both Mulder and Furman
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON15 w/ Mulder·24 w/ Furman
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON16 w/ Mulder·22 w/ Furman
United States
LOCATION16 w/ Mulder·10 w/ Furman
Julie K. Brown
PERSON14 w/ Mulder·9 w/ Furman
George W. Bush
PERSON12 w/ Mulder·10 w/ Furman
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION13 w/ Mulder·6 w/ Furman
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON14 w/ Mulder·4 w/ Furman
Michael Jackson
PERSON11 w/ Mulder·7 w/ Furman
Colorado
LOCATION10 w/ Mulder·7 w/ Furman
the Southern District
LOCATION10 w/ Mulder·7 w/ Furman
Bloomberg L.P.
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Mulder·12 w/ Furman
the Second Circuit's
ORGANIZATION13 w/ Mulder·3 w/ Furman
Bronx
LOCATION10 w/ Mulder·6 w/ Furman
North Carolina
LOCATION10 w/ Mulder·5 w/ Furman
Prince Andrew
PERSON7 w/ Mulder·8 w/ Furman
Bill Richardson
PERSON11 w/ Mulder·3 w/ Furman
Carpenter
PERSON11 w/ Mulder·3 w/ Furman
Kaplan
PERSON11 w/ Mulder·3 w/ Furman
Sacramento
LOCATION11 w/ Mulder·3 w/ Furman
Harvey Weinstein
PERSON4 w/ Mulder·10 w/ Furman