Epstein Secrets

nt on with regard to a Fonti scheme in which he was not an investor. MO are also contending nothing about what went on at Rothstein, Rosenfoldt 4 Adler can form the basis for a claim because of the litigation privilege, absolute immunity of the litigation privilege. So the defense -- excuse me th

:17 actual 30:17 44:13 add 52:4 added 46:25 80:10 adding 30:14 additional 66:7 address 4:11 25:9 adduced 32:22 adequacy 13:11 adequate 65:6 Adler 32:11 Administration 19:18 administrative 53:4 admire 41:4 admissible 24:1 adverse 87:13,19 aforesaid 1:21 afraid 16:5 AG 73:23 age 4:1 ag

ou 23 the difference. 23 can't fix today what was wrong in May, 24 If I put his language In, which tied it 24 that's the problem. 25 to the Ponsi scheme, be wouldn't have added 25 THE COURT: The pretrial stipulation, Palm Beach Reporting Service, Inc. 561-471-2995 EFTA00793892 2 3 4 5

d by the firm to work with 4 Stove Abrams in opening up the office here. 5 Q Did you then interview with the firm of 4 Rothstein, Rosenfoldt a Adler? 7 A Yea. Stuart and I talked, and then ho 4 introduced ma to Scott Rothstein, and that was the • interview I had. 10 Rothstein and I talked

here in 2008 you faced the economic reality of having to leave the bench. where did you than go? A I was hired by the Rothstein, Rosonfoldt a Adler firm. O How did that cone about? A As I said, I was interviewing with two firms. 10 There wore two largo firma that had offices in Palm Beach

hree child victims? A No. Q Dld there coma a tine when you learned that Rothstein had used the cases that we have been referring to to attract Ponsi schema investor➢? A I learned that sometime in the beginning of November of 2009 by -- , by reading it in the paper. Q prior to that tine, w

the Rothstein, 20 it docunonts, chat wore sent co us not covering all of the 724. And obviously, your Honor knows from the 2s , 31 Rosenfeld[, Adler urn a trustee was appointed by the bankruptcy court to take control of the firm, 22 materials that you have reviewed much attention was =2 and t

ding this. I Combine Investments versus Rothstein. 0 believe that prejudice outweighs any, any value it I Interestingly, a natter related to the Ponsi a might have, any relevance in this action, because , schma. 10 he needs co show damages proximately caused and not 10 And those two eases to

the Rothstein, 20 it docunonts, chat wore sent co us not covering all of the 724. And obviously, your Honor knows from the 2s , 31 Rosenfeld[, Adler urn a trustee was appointed by the bankruptcy court to take control of the firm, 22 materials that you have reviewed much attention was =2 and t

ding this. I Combine Investments versus Rothstein. 0 believe that prejudice outweighs any, any value it I Interestingly, a natter related to the Ponsi a might have, any relevance in this action, because , schma. 10 he needs co show damages proximately caused and not 10 And those two eases to