Epstein Secrets

der. 2. Included within that submission was extensive internal email correspondence from Edwards' time as an attorney at Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler. These emails were admittedly obtained from a CD that Epstein's current counsel acquired from its predecessor counsel, Fowler White. 3. At least

filed his Supplement to the Motion to Strike, which identified a Federal Court Order issued on November 30, 2010 by the Honorable Raymond B. Ray of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida, prohibiting Epstein's prior counsel, Fowler White, from creating or retaining the CD in question, and reservin

urisdiction over RRA rests in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida in the case of In Re: Rothstein, Rosenfeld and Adler, Case No. 09- 34791-BKC-RER. This Court has effectively recognized as much in a prior subpoena issued upon Mr. Stettin, RBA's Trustee. Moreover, the

rotective Order as to a Subpoena issued upon him for records to be produced by March 16, 2011 and states: 1. First, jurisdiction over RRA rests in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida in the case of In Re: Rothstein, Rosenfeld and Adler, Case No. 09- 34791-BKC-RER. This Court has effectively re

of Edwards' representation of multiple young female victims of Epstein's sexual abuse. While an employee of the now defunct Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, Adler firm and with his current firm, Edwards filed and pursued civil lawsuits Mr. Edwards, an attorney with the FJW firm, is represented by Jack Scarola

tein was to prepare a consent order memorializing the agreement. It never did. Instead, Epstein decided to launch litigation in yet another forum — the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida. On July 14, 2010, Epstein filed a Motion to Compel production of numerous documents from Trustee Stettin in t