Epstein Secrets

From: Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacatio mail.com> To: Erdoes, Mary E < > CC: Staley, Jes < Shenker. Nina O" < > Sent: 5/30/2011 12:00:47 PM Subject: Re: fyi thank you On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Erdoes, Mary E v, role. Jeffrey- Yes, w

gal is abundantly clear once all the documents are reviewed, as opposed to only what wendalll has. I expressed in no uncertain terms in talking with Condren that I view this as a dispute ( Me vs JPM , in the Bear STearns case) as a family disagreement,. hopefully not discounted , by my well stated desire

From: Erdoes, Mary E To: [email protected]' <* evacation mail.com>;Staley, Jes" < CC: Shenker, Nina O < Sent: 5/30/2011 11:53:40 AM Subject: Re: fyi Jeffrey- Yes, we are going to have Condren step in here on this issue as well as the Bear

gal is abundantly clear once all the documents are reviewed, as opposed to only what wendalll has. I expressed in no uncertain terms in talking with Condren that I view this as a dispute ( Me vs JPM , in the Bear STearns case) as a family disagreement,. hopefully not discounted , by my well stated desire

From: "Erdoes, Mary E" To: [email protected] <[email protected]>, "Staley, Jesi CC: "Shenker, Nina O" t> Subject: Re: fyi Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 10:53:40 +0000 Jeffrey- Yes, we are going to have Condren step in here on this issue as well

gal is abundantly clear once all the documents are reviewed, as opposed to only what wendalll has. I expressed in no uncertain terms in talking with Condren that I view this as a dispute ( Me vs JPM , in the Bear STearns case) as a family disagreement,. hopefully not discounted , by my well stated desire