Epstein Secrets

e of the Inspector General (OIG), New York Field Office submitted a Digital Forensics Examination Request form seeking analysis of Devices 1 and 2. Carpenter requested a search of Devices 1 and 2 for a timeline of user activity and work product from 8/9/2019 to 8/10/2019. Carpenter arranged for the seizur

used by BOP Materials Handler Supervisor Michael Thomas during the relevant time frame, and that Device 2 had been used by BOP Correctional Officer Tova Noel during the same period. On August 13, 2019, OIG Lead Information Technology Specialis Cyber Investigations Office (CYBER), received the above refe

o my boss. And then, 11 given it to the IG. I forgot. I forget his 12 name, and who was handling the case. 13 : For the IG? 14 : Yeah. 15 : Carpenter. 16 : If you weren't giving it 17 to (Indiscernible *01:55:18), it would have 18 been Dave Carpenter. 19 : Because he sat in there with 20

encountered him to do anything, known him not 25 to count, do his job, you know? EFTA00059046 LIMITED OFFICIAL USE 1 2 177 : What about Ms. Tova Noel? : She was new. So, she had 3 just gotten there. You know, she got the same 4 spiel from me that everybody else does. You 5 know? You are new.

From: " (NY) (FBI)" To: "Carpenter, David M. (OIG)" <David.M.Carpenter@usdoj.gov> Subject: RE: MCC officer subpoenas and approaches Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 18:05:36 +0000 Importance:

nter will coordinate from the O16 side. Bekah and I can assist with putting together brief interview outlines for these folks. Thanks everyone! 1. Tova Noel (off duty) —going now 2. Michael Thomas (off duty) — going now 3. Nathaniel Bullock — going now 4. Capt. Darden (off now, on tonight) — need to

cr-00830-AT Document 36 Filed 06/09/20 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, -against- TOVA NOEL and MICHAEL THOMAS, Defendants. USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY Fli i) DOC #: DATE FILED: 6/9/2020 19 Cr. 830-2 (AT) ORDER ANALISA TORRE

defense." United States v. Ulbricht, 858 F.3d 71, 109 (2d Cir. 2017) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted), abrogated on other grounds by Carpenter v. United States, 138 S. Ct. 2206 (2018). "In order to compel the Government to produce certain evidence, a defendant must make a prima facie showin