Epstein Secrets

not accessible; no media information. Pre-trial motions. Charged with using telephone wires, Internet and U.S. mail. Overruled by United States' Griffith, 284 F.3d 338, 351 (2d Cir. 2002). 2422(6); 2423 No Information 80 EFTA00224214 COURT CASES FACILITY FAC'T'S/COMMUNICATION CHARGE lial

20 years earlier. Denied. 2422(b); 2423(b) No Information 65 EFTA00224199 COURT CASES FACILITY FACTS/COMMUNICATION CHARGE W.D. Mo. U.S. I Hicks, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS Internet Defendant alleged to have used Internet & telephone to entice a minor; traveled to engage t in sex ac. 2422(b)

use of telephone, Internet and mail Pre-trial motions. Charged With using telephone wires , Internet and U.S. mail. Overruled by United States v. Griffith, 284 F.3d 338, 351 (2d Cir. 2002). 2422(b); 2423 No Information U.S. v. Rivera, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65971 (D. Conn. 2006) No Information

belief that she was 14 yrs-old. 29 EFTA01729513 COURT. . .. . . , • - S ' -- ,S2W114117 - ;FJQCTS'IC0MMUlite4OO,.; •,': -03ARGE U.S. v. Hicks, 457 F.3d 838 (8ih Cir. 2006), overruled Helder, 452 F.3d 751 Internet defendant initiated Internet conversation with "13 yr-old" followed by t

d use of telephone, intemet and mail he-trial motions. Charged with using telephone wires , Internet and U.S. mail. Overruled by United States v. Griffith, 284 F.3d 338, 351 (2d Cir. 2002). 2422(b); 2423 No Information U.S. v. Rivera. 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65971 (D. Conn. 2006) No Information

29 EFTA00079442 -;"COHRT; C.ASES C6:”14.111•47.Cia.:e. - :finik 4 ;acIale.40,... - ,,, - ' FACILITY FACZS/COMMUNICATION CHARGE U.S. v. Hicks. Internet defendant initiated Internet conversation 2422(b); 2423(b) 457 F.3d 838 (8th Cir. 2006), overruled Helder,452 F.3d 751 Stine with "

ng that the deletion of the word "knowingly" from § 2251 reflected an intent to eliminate knowledge age as an element of the crime); United States Griffith. 284 F.3d 338, 349 (2d Cir.2002) (rejecting defendants' argument that the district court's charge to the jury omitting scienter of age under § 2251

ation of federal law. This argument is foreclosed by our deci- sions in United States v. Helder, 452 F.3d 751 (8th Cir.2006), and United States v. Hicks, 457 FM 838 (8th Cir2006). In Heftier, we concluded that an actual minor victim is not required for the crime of attempted enticement under § 2422