Epstein Secrets

of complex planetary motions as simple ellipses, Bohr's explanation of the periodic table of the elements in terms of electron shells, and Watson and Crick's double helix. Einstein famously said that he did not need experimental confirmation of his general theory of relativity because it "was so beautifu

plain some diverse and complicated set of phenomena. ‘obs >> [Thanks to Steven Pinker for suggesting this year's EDGE Question and to Stewart Brand, Kevin Kelly, and George Dyson for their ongoing advice and support. | Sebs DD me cn ne ne ne ne nnn nn ne nn ne en nn nn ee nn nn nn ne nn nn ne ne nn re enn n

f complex planetary =otions as simple ellipses, Bohr's explanation of the periodic table of =he elements in terms of electron shells, and Watson and Crick's double =elix. Einstein famously said that he did not need experimental =onfirmation of his general theory of relativity because it "was so =eautif

explain some diverse and complicated set of =henomena. » [Thanks to Steven Pinker for suggesting this year's EDGE Question and » =o Stewart Brand, Kevin Kelly, and George Dyson for their ongoing » advice =nd support.) >> >> - >> 2 EFTA_R1_01701198 EFTA02547014 » - » » "Open-minded, free ranging,

f complex planetary =otions as simple ellipses, Bohr's explanation of the periodic table of =he elements in terms of electron shells, and Watson and Crick's double =elix. Einstein famously said that he did not need experimental =onfirmation of his general theory of relativity because it "was so =eautif

idea explain some diverse and complicated set of =henomena. (Thanks to Steven Pinker for suggesting this year's EDGE Question and to =tewart Brand, Kevin Kelly, and George Dyson for their ongoing advice =nd support.) "Open-minded, free ranging, intellectually playful ... an unadorned =leasure in curiosity,

f complex planetary motions as simple ellipses= Bohr's explanation of the periodic table of the elements in terms of electron shells, and Watson and Crick's double helix. Einstein famously said that=he did not need experimental confirmation of his general theory of relativi=y because it "was so beautif

explain=some diverse and complicated set of phenomena. > [Thanks to Steven Pinker for suggesting this year's EDGE Question and > to S=ewart Brand, Kevin Kelly, and George Dyson for their ongoing > advice and sup=ort.] > - > "Open-minded, free ranging, intellectually playful ... an unadorned pleasu=e in

creativity, or evil to that artifact than I do to ascribe those properties to its natural counterparts, like other human beings. Thus, by combining Crick’s “astonishing hypothesis” in neurobiology with powerful evidence from physics, we deduce that natural intelligence is a special case of artificial i

ieve, an approach that may work. Humans can reasonably be described as having (mostly implicit) preferences over their future lives—that is, given @ Kevin Kelly, “The Myth of a Superhuman AI,” Wired, Apr. 25, 2017. 33 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016836 enough time and unlimited visual aids, a human could express a pre

creativity, or evil to that artifact than I do to ascribe those properties to its natural counterparts, like other human beings. Thus, by combining Crick’s “astonishing hypothesis” in neurobiology with powerful evidence from physics, we deduce that natural intelligence is a special case of artificial i

ieve, an approach that may work. Humans can reasonably be described as having (mostly implicit) preferences over their future lives—that is, given @ Kevin Kelly, “The Myth of a Superhuman AI,” Wired, Apr. 25, 2017. 33 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016253 enough time and unlimited visual aids, a human could express a pre