Epstein Secrets

tional transit was not unreasonable. 547 F.3d at 1004. Similarly, we have approved a quick look and unintrusive search of laptops. United States v. Arnold. 533 F.3d 1003, 1009 (9th Cir.2008) (holding border search reasonable where "CBP officers simply 'had [traveler] boot [the laptop] up, and looked

sm. Moreover, the task of distinguishing these "comprehensive and intrusive" laptop searches from the "unintrusive search" of a laptop affirmed in Arnold, 533 F.3d at 1008, or the search of a private letter affirmed in United States v. Seljan, 547 F.3d 993, 1003 (9th Cir.2008) (en bane), leaves borde

urnal =. 3018 11 -I KeyCite Yellow Flag - Negative Treatment Declined to Extend by United States v. Hassanshahi. December I. 2014 709 F.3d 952 United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Howard Wesley COTTERMAN, Defendant—Appellee. No. 09-10139. I Argued and Sub

e imposing secrecy on proceedings does not create an privilege. West's F.S.A. § 905.27; Evid.Rule 501, 28 U.S.C.A. *555 Lamar Winegeark III, Arnold. Booth, Jacksonville, Fla., for Greene. grand jury evidentiary Fed.Rules Stratford & Elizabeth L. White, Sheppard & White, William Sheppard, J

ey EFTA00277553 UN/VD/LOUD ZU:4C rAA 0010V41JOI VaAv tiff, IL, 832 F.2d 554 832 F.2d 554, 24 Fed. R. Evid. Sm. 275 (Cite as: 832 F.2d 554) H United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. In re GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGS—Subpoena to State Attorney's Office. Thomas H. Greene, Dawson A. McQuaig, Jake Godbold, Don McClu

rt for the District of South Dakota, Charles B. Kommann, J., imposed a 295-month sentence, and defendant appealed. Holdings: The Court of Appeals, Arnold, Cir- cuit Judge, held that: (1) defendant forfeited his Ex Post Facto Clause argument, and (2) district court made adequate findings to support

737 504 F.3d 737, 07 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 11,330, 2007 Daily Journal D.A.R. 14,672 (Cite as: 504 F.3d 737) H U.S. Sinerius C.A.9 (Mont.),2007. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Arthur Emil SINERIUS, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. No. 06-30327. Argued and Submitt