Epstein Secrets

ial conditions and characteristic geometries and measures. It was the Russian mathematicians, A.N. Kolmogorov (1957), Sinai (1959) and V.I. Arnold (Arnold and Avez, 1968), the French mathematicians, Rene Thom (1972) and David Ruelle (1978) and the U.C. Berkeley mathematicians, Steve Smale (1967) and his

ising the post-repentance blessings of Jesus. The eldest, articulate, bright and prematurely worldly, had been an ardent memorizer and appreciator of Shakespeare, especially the mystical Tempest, the music of Aaron Copeland and Igor Stravinsky, the improvisations of Charlie Parker and Cannon Ball Adderley and

’s treatment of “information” sounded more like Matthew Arnold in 1869°? than Claude Shannon in 1948—more “body and spirit” than “bit.” Wiener shared Arnold’s Romantic view of the “content producer” as well. “Properly speaking the artist, the writer, and the scientist should be moved by such an irresistib

ommunity, must say something substantially different from the community’s previous common stock of information.” This was why “schoolboys do not like Shakespeare,” he concluded: The Bard’s couplets may depart starkly from random bitstreams, but they had nonetheless become all too familiar to the sense-making p

’s treatment of “information” sounded more like Matthew Arnold in 1869°? than Claude Shannon in 1948—more “body and spirit” than “bit.” Wiener shared Arnold’s Romantic view of the “content producer” as well. “Properly speaking the artist, the writer, and the scientist should be moved by such an irresistib

ommunity, must say something substantially different from the community’s previous common stock of information.” This was why “schoolboys do not like Shakespeare,” he concluded: The Bard’s couplets may depart starkly from random bitstreams, but they had nonetheless become all too familiar to the sense-making p