Epstein Secrets

racy existed to limit trade in resin; (2) termination was ancil- lary restraint of trade, precluding determina- tion that it was per se violation of Sherman Act § 1; and (3) there was no unreasonable restraint of trade, under rule of reason stan- dard. Summary judgment granted in part 1. Federal Civil

ie showing that minimum contacts warranting personal jurisdiction exist.FN3 Mellon Bank (East) PSFS Nat. Ass'n I. Farina, 960 F.2d 1217, 1223 (3d Cir.1992). FN3. The Court notes that although a Plaintiff need only make a prima facie showing of jurisdiction to defeat a motion under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(bX

f conditional leniency to Stolt- Nielsen on March 2, 2004, and announced that it intended to indict the Company and Wingfield for violations of the Sherman Act.I I. Although the Government "charged" Wing- field by criminal complaint in June 2003. it could not prosecute him without an indict- ment. See

d 20, the district court held a probable cause hear- ing pursuant to United States tz All Assets of Statewide Auto Pads, Inc. 971 F2d 896, 906 (2d Cir.1992) and United States v. Monsanto, 924 F2d 1186, 1203 (2d Cir.1991). On May 30, 1995, the district court vacated the seizure warrant, finding that th

s, Justice Dept., Washington Post, February 21, 2007 (http://www.washingtonpost.cotn/svp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/20/AR2007022001344.html) 16. A Sherman, Mark, "Berger Pleads Guilty to Taking Materials" (http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bintarticle.cgi? f=/n/a/2005/04/01/national/w111624S64.DTL), Associated

ase r remanded on other grounds. See United States Palmer, Palmer, F.3d 760, 767 (8th Cir.2002); sited States Montana, 979 F.2d 136, 138 (8th Cir.1992); United States I Fiallo-Jacome, 874 F.2d 1479, 1481-83 (11th Cir.1989). We conclude that Mr. Carter has forfeited his *646 current ex post facto