Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
, No. 13 CIV. 1654 RA HBP, 2014 WL 5420225 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 24, 2014) 2 United States v. Cortina, 630 F.2d 1207 (7th Cir. 1980) 5 United States v. Heath, 455 F.3d 52 (2d Cir. 2006) 7 United States v. Lavender, 583 F.2d 630 (2d Cir. 1978) 2, 4 United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897 (1984) 5 United S
arpenter v. United States would have come out differently, since the defendant's historical cell-site location information was in the possession of MetroPCS and Sprint. 138 S. Ct. 2206, 2212 (2018). But the United States Supreme Court rejected application of the third-party doctrine for two reasons, as t
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
, No. 13 CIV. 1654 RA HBP, 2014 WL 5420225 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 24, 2014) 2 United States v. Cortina, 630 F.2d 1207 (7th Cir. 1980) 5 United States v. Heath, 455 F.3d 52 (2d Cir. 2006) 7 United States v. Lavender, 583 F.2d 630 (2d Cir. 1978) 2, 4 United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897 (1984) 5 United S
arpenter v. United States would have come out differently, since the defendant's historical cell-site location information was in the possession of MetroPCS and Sprint. 138 S. Ct. 2206, 2212 (2018). But the United States Supreme Court rejected application of the third-party doctrine for two reasons, as t
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
, No. 13 CIV. 1654 RA HBP, 2014 WL 5420225 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 24, 2014) 2 United States v. Cortina, 630 F.2d 1207 (7th Cir. 1980) 5 United States v. Heath, 455 F.3d 52 (2d Cir. 2006) 7 United States v. Lavender, 583 F.2d 630 (2d Cir. 1978) 2, 4 United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897 (1984) 5 United S
arpenter v. United States would have come out differently, since the defendant's historical cell-site location information was in the possession of MetroPCS and Sprint. 138 S. Ct. 2206, 2212 (2018). But the United States Supreme Court rejected application of the third-party doctrine for two reasons, as t
Sponsored
2 mentions
Page EFTA00018999
, No. 13 CIV. 1654 RA HBP, 2014 WL 5420225 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 24, 2014) 2 United States v. Cortina, 630 F.2d 1207 (7th Cir. 1980) 5 United States v. Heath, 455 F.3d 52 (2d Cir. 2006) 7 United States v. Lavender, 583 F.2d 630 (2d Cir. 1978) 2, 4 United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897 (1984) 5 United S
Page: EFTA00018999 →Page EFTA00019003
arpenter v. United States would have come out differently, since the defendant's historical cell-site location information was in the possession of MetroPCS and Sprint. 138 S. Ct. 2206, 2212 (2018). But the United States Supreme Court rejected application of the third-party doctrine for two reasons, as t
Page: EFTA00019003 →Sponsored
Mutual Connections (68)
Entities connected to both Heath and MetroPCS
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON33 w/ Heath·13 w/ MetroPCS
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON23 w/ Heath·6 w/ MetroPCS
United States
LOCATION21 w/ Heath·6 w/ MetroPCS
Julie K. Brown
PERSON21 w/ Heath·3 w/ MetroPCS
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON13 w/ Heath·9 w/ MetroPCS
George W. Bush
PERSON19 w/ Heath·2 w/ MetroPCS
Prince Andrew
PERSON18 w/ Heath·3 w/ MetroPCS
Oregon
LOCATION14 w/ Heath·6 w/ MetroPCS
Carpenter
PERSON14 w/ Heath·5 w/ MetroPCS
ST
Stokes
PERSON14 w/ Heath·4 w/ MetroPCS
DI
Darren Indyke
PERSON14 w/ Heath·4 w/ MetroPCS
CM
Colleen McMahon
PERSON14 w/ Heath·4 w/ MetroPCS
SW
Sweet
PERSON14 w/ Heath·4 w/ MetroPCS
ET
Emmy Taylor
PERSON14 w/ Heath·4 w/ MetroPCS
David Boies
PERSON14 w/ Heath·4 w/ MetroPCS
Atlanta
LOCATION5 w/ Heath·12 w/ MetroPCS
Stephen Hawking
PERSON12 w/ Heath·5 w/ MetroPCS
Sacramento
LOCATION11 w/ Heath·6 w/ MetroPCS
DB
Doug Band
PERSON15 w/ Heath·2 w/ MetroPCS
the Southern District
LOCATION13 w/ Heath·3 w/ MetroPCS