Epstein Secrets

imes Co. v. Dep't of Def., 499 F. Supp. 2d 501 (S.D.N.Y. 2007) 8 N.Y. Times Co. v. Dep't of Justice, 2016 WL 5946711 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 18, 2016) 3 New York Times Co. v. Dep't of Justice, 390 F. Supp. 3d 499, 512 (S.D.N.Y. 2019) 3 N.Y. Times Co. v. Dep't of Health and Human Servs., 2021 U.S. Dist. Lexis 6267 (S

nforcement purposes" because they were created "in the exercise of BOP's statutory authority to detain arrested individuals." (Supplemental Decl. of Kara Christenson, ECF No. 39 [hereinafter "Christenson Supp. Decl."], at ¶ 29.) But this sweeping application of Exemption 7(A) would effectively shield every BOP r

imes Co. v. Dep't of Def., 499 F. Supp. 2d 501 (S.D.N.Y. 2007) 8 N.Y. Times Co. v. Dep't of Justice, 2016 WL 5946711 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 18, 2016) 3 New York Times Co. v. Dep't of Justice, 390 F. Supp. 3d 499, 512 (S.D.N.Y. 2019) 3 N.Y. Times Co. v. Dep't of Health and Human Servs., 2021 U.S. Dist. Lexis 6267 (S

nforcement purposes" because they were created "in the exercise of BOP's statutory authority to detain arrested individuals." (Supplemental Decl. of Kara Christenson, ECF No. 39 [hereinafter "Christenson Supp. Decl."], at ¶ 29.) But this sweeping application of Exemption 7(A) would effectively shield every BOP r

imes Co. v. Dep't of Def., 499 F. Supp. 2d 501 (S.D.N.Y. 2007) 8 N.Y. Times Co. v. Dep't of Justice, 2016 WL 5946711 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 18, 2016) 3 New York Times Co. v. Dep't of Justice, 390 F. Supp. 3d 499, 512 (S.D.N.Y. 2019) 3 N.Y. Times Co. v. Dep't of Health and Human Servs., 2021 U.S. Dist. Lexis 6267 (S

nforcement purposes" because they were created "in the exercise of BOP's statutory authority to detain arrested individuals." (Supplemental Decl. of Kara Christenson, ECF No. 39 [hereinafter "Christenson Supp. Decl."], at ¶ 29.) But this sweeping application of Exemption 7(A) would effectively shield every BOP r