Epstein Secrets

19-411 SDNY_GM_00331788 EFTA_002045 14 EFTA02729499 e in connection with sentencing" (Post Resp. at 9, citing Sarasota Herald Tribune, Div. of the New York Times Co. v. Holizendorf, 507 So. 2d 667, 668 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987)). The non-prosecution agreement is not a plea agreement and was not a document Judge Pucill

'S MOTION TO DISIMISS PETITION FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION Petitioner, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, replies to the three separate responses filed by respondents, E.W., B.B., and the Post, and responds to E.W.'s Request to Dismiss Petition for Lack of Jurisdiction as follows: The non-prosecution agreement and adde

agreement and addendum is confidential by its terms. Mr. Epstein directs this Court to review paragraph 13 of the sealed non-prosecution agreement. E.W.'s argument is also disingenuous. EW has had the non-prosecution agreement for months, yet never advanced this position in federal or state court un

la. 5th DCA 1994) 21 In re Amendments to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.420 954 So. 2d 16 (Fla. 2007) Sarasota Herald Tribune. Div. of the New York Times Co.'. Holtzendorf, 507 So. 2d 667(Fla. 2d DCA 1987) 9 Sarasota-Herald Tribune I State, 924 So. 2d 8 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) 2 Sentinel Communications Co.

for respondent, State of Florida) B.B. (non-party intervener) William J. Berger of Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler (counsel for non-party intervener, E.W.) Honorable Jeffrey J. Colbath (circuit court judge) Barbara J. Compiani of Kreusler-Walsh, Compiani & Vargas, P.A. (appellate counsel for petiti

fact, the U.S. Attorney's Office has taken no position on this matter throughout the lower court proceedings and specifically informed counsel for E.W. that it had no position (A-18 at p. 7,11. 10-14.) At that hearing, the Court found that the proper procedures to initially seal the records were not

se No. 08-80736 (S.D. Fla. 2008). 09/12/2019 Plan CONF NTIAL Agency to Agency Requet: 19-411 SDNY_GM_00331941 EFTA_002 04667 EFTA02729651 of the New York Times Co. v. Holtzendorf, 507 So. 2d 667, 668 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987) ("While a judge may impose whatever legal sentence he chooses, if such sentence is based on a

s: 1. EW is filed a motion to vacate the agreed order sealing records and to unseal the nonprosecutuion agreement and addendum in this file. Also, E.W. opposed defendant's motion to unseal said records. E.W.'s motion was granted and defendant's was denied at hearing on June 26, 2009. 2. E.W. is en

8 PO?306/027 F-845 1 ' P p . ,'. hi, • :Ir ' ::' • . :iii 1 : , : • . ti • I • ir :1: # !! ' ; 1. f. • r ': ! ' ro . ..iit r :,.... of tits New York Times Co. v. ifoltrendori 507 So. 2d 667.668 (Fla. 12,4 D.CA 1907) ("While a : i. .: : !: 1 Judge may Impose whatever legal sentence be chooses, if such sen

quy, they were an inducement for defendant to enter into his guilty pleas. They are proper objects of discovery. However, unless they are unsealed, E.W. is unable to obtain them or utilize them in her case. 7. Pursuant to Rule 2.420(dX5), the Court must hold a hearing on this motion in open court.