Epstein Secrets

— 2009 Current — 2009 Current — 2006 Current — 2006 Current — 2004 2016 - 2011 Editor-in-chief, Information Processing & Management (Elsevier) Editorial Board Member, Information Discovery and Delivery Editorial Advisory Board Member, Social Networks Editorial Advisory Board Member, International Journal

76 EFTA00601652 Appendix B Testimony Cases Last Four Years Year Retained Deliverables Retained by Case 2016 Deposition Report Plaintiff Jane Doe v. Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling Inc.; BHP Billiton Petroleum (Deepwater) Ltd.; Schlumberger Technology Corporation; Aramark Services, In

Elected Fellow 2011 OTHER PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Member, Psychology Education Review Committee, Associate Editor, American Psychologist, 1990-94 Editorial Board Member: Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1974-87 Human Learning, 1980-86 Social Cognition, 1981-92 Law and Society Review, 1982-86 Informatio

Balancing with the players stacked against you. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 365-366 (Book Review). Loftus, E.F. & Guyer, M. (2002) Who Abused Jane Doe?: The Hazards of the Single Case History. Skeptical Inquirer. Part I. Vol 26, #3 (May/June), Pp. 24-32. Loftus, E. F. & Guyer, M. J. (2002) Who Abu

ath to Census Citizenship Question Exists but He Gives No Details Public Corruption Epstein Who Protected Jeffrey Epstein? New York Times By The Editorial Board 7/8/19 On Monday, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York unsealed a 14-page indictment against Jeffrey Epstein, ch

.' Questions about Epstein's deal started to surface after a series of lawsuits were filed by two of his alleged victims. The women, identified as Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2, claim in court papers that they were unaware of the secret deal being made between the defense team and prosecutors back in 2007 tha

ils 42 I EFTA00076657 SDNY News Clips, Tuesday, July 9, 2019 Public Corruption Epstein Who Protected Jeffrey Epstein? New York Times By The Editorial Board 7/8/19 On Monday, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York unsealed a 14-page indictment against Jeffrey Epstein, ch

.' Questions about Epstein's deal started to surface after a series of lawsuits were filed by two of his alleged victims. The women, identified as Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2, claim in court papers that they were unaware of the secret deal being made between the defense team and prosecutors back in 2007 tha

cal Journal Editorial Board, Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, Assistant Editor,1974-1978; Associate Editor, 1978-1988) Editorial Board, Psychiatric Journal of the University of Ottawa Editorial Board, Journal of Forensic Sciences Editorial Board, Behavioral Sciences and the Law A

k, New York) [2nd Circuit Opinion: 938 F.2d 1535 (2nd Cir. 1991)] Testified at deposition, 5/13/90 Testified in court (trial or hearing), 5/14/90 Jane Doe v. Stuart Brown. M.D. (San Diego, California) Testified by deposition, 6/6/90 Carin Evans vs. Richard Benton, Ph.D. (Houston, Texas) Testified at