Epstein Secrets

South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Fax. 561 828 0983 Counsel for Defendant Robert D. Critton, Esq. Michael J. Pike, Esq. Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman, LLP 515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Fax. 561 515 3148 Co-Counsel for Jeffrey Epstein 25 Lew

iew Mr. Josefsberg's outstanding bills on a line-by-line basis and attempt to reach a non- adversarial resolution of all outstanding fee issues. Mr. Critton also transmitted to Mr. Josefsberg an Agreement for Special Master to Determine Amount of Attorneys' Fees and Costs ("Special Master Agreement"), s

one) 5 KATHERINE W. EZELL, ESQ. 6 Podhurst Orseck Josefsberg 25 West Flagler Street 7 Miami, FL 33130 For Jane Doe 101 8 FOR THE DEFENDANT: ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ. 9 MICHAEL BURMAN, ESQ. Burman Critton, etc. 10 515 North Flagler Street West Palm Beach, FL 33401 11 561.842.2820 12 JACK A. GOL

urt where one has that right, and should be equally vigilant to protect the right to proceed in the Federal court."' Legg, 428 F.3d at 1325 (citing Wecker v. Nat'l Enameling & Stamping Co., 204 U.S. 176, 186 (1907)). See also id. (observing that "Congress `did not extend [to defendants a right of removal] with one hand, and with the o

tralian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach Florida 33401 Fax. Counsel for Defendant Robert D. Critton, Esq. Michael J. Pike, Esq. Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman, LLP 515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400 West Palm Beach Florida 33401 Fax. Co-Counsel for Jeffrey Epstein 25 LeVykt:11:, in

ruce E. Reinhart, Esq. Bruce E. Reinhart, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach Florida 33401 Fax. Counsel for Defendant Robert D. Critton, Esq. Michael J. Pike, Esq. Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman, LLP 515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400 West Palm Beach Florida 33401 Fax. Co-Coun

urt where one has that right, and should be equally vigilant to protect the right to proceed in the Federal court.'" Legg, 428 F.3d at 1325 (citing Wecker v. Nat'l Enameling & Stamping Co., 204 U.S. 176, 186 (1907)). See also id. (observing that "Congress 'did not extend [to defendants a right of removal] with one hand, and with the o

, Esq. McIntosh, Sawran, Peltz & Cartaya P.A. Counsel for Defendant Haley Robson Bruce E. Reinhart, Esq. Bruce E. Reinhart, P.A. n an •ra e en Robert D. Critton, Esq. Michael J. Pike, Esq. Burman, Critton, Luther & Coleman LL' o- ounse or cirey Epstein 25 Lewis Teinrv. 3059 Gum) Avow,. Sum 140. Cot owl

ourt where one has that right, and should be equally vigilant to protect the right to proceed in the Federal court.'" Lea, 428 F.3d at 1325 (citing Wecker v. Nat'l Enameling & Stamping Co., 204 U.S. 176, 186 (1907)). See also id. (observing that "Congress `did not extend [to defendants a right of removal] with one hand, and with the o