Epstein Secrets

ED Michael Ross Tein Lewis Tein 3059 Grand Avenue Suite 340 Cocos Grove , FL 33133 Fax: 442- 4 Email: LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Robert Deweese Critton , Jr. Burman Critton Luttier & Coleman 515 N Flagler Drive Suite 400 West Palm Beach , FL 33401-2918 Fax: Email: LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE

Doe Epstein, et. al. CASE NO: 08-80804-Civ-MARIUUJOHNSON United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Robert Critton, Esq. Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman, LLP 515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: Fax: Counsel for Jeffley Epstein Served via U.S. Mail,

-80804-C1V-MARRA/JOHNSON BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN, LLP 515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400 West Palm Beach. Florida 33401 Tel. Fax. By: Robert D. Critton, Esq. Fla. Bar No. 224162 [email protected] Michael J. Pike, Esq. Fla. Bar No. 617296 Attorneys for Defendant Jeff Ry Epstein CERTIFICATE OF

t her entire amended complaint, the plaintiff uses the term "scheme" as though it were a password for gaining access to RICO standing. Cf. Newton'. Tyson Foods, Inc., 207 F.3d 444, 447 (8th Cir. 2000) (observing in the context of indirect and attenuated RICO allegations that "[t]he mere recitation of the chain o

ssions. In light of these facts, we intend to make use of this correspondence in the ICYRell . lawsuit[J . . . . Letter from Bradley J. Edwards to Robert D. Critton, Jr., Aug. 26, 2010 (Exhibit A to this pleading) (emphasis added) One week later, on September 2, 2010, Epstein filed a motion for a protective ord

required to make the same initial disclosures that are part and parcel of civil suits. He would also presumably be subject to deposition. See Fox v. Tyson Foods, Inc., 519 F.3d 1298, 1305 (11th Cir. 2008) (affirming denial of motion to intervene because of delay that would be involved in deposing the intervenors)

ssions. In light of these facts, we intend to make use of this correspondence in the (CVRAJ ... lawsuit() . . . . Letter from Bradley J. Edwards to Robert D. Critton, Jr., Aug. 26, 2010 (Exhibit A to this pleading) (emphasis added) One week later, on September 2, 2010, Epstein filed a motion for a protective ord

required to make the same initial disclosures that are part and parcel of civil suits. He would also presumably be subject to deposition. See Fox v. Tyson Foods, Inc., 519 F.3d 1298, 1305 (11th Cir. 2008) (affirming denial of motion to intervene because of delay that would be involved in deposing the intervenors)