Epstein Secrets

South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Fax. 561 828 0983 Counsel for Defendant Robert D. Critton, Esq. Michael J. Pike, Esq. Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman, LLP 515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Fax. 561 515 3148 Co-Counsel for Jeffrey Epstein 25 Lew

iew Mr. Josefsberg's outstanding bills on a line-by-line basis and attempt to reach a non- adversarial resolution of all outstanding fee issues. Mr. Critton also transmitted to Mr. Josefsberg an Agreement for Special Master to Determine Amount of Attorneys' Fees and Costs ("Special Master Agreement"), s

one) 5 KATHERINE W. EZELL, ESQ. 6 Podhurst Orseck Josefsberg 25 West Flagler Street 7 Miami, FL 33130 For Jane Doe 101 8 FOR THE DEFENDANT: ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ. 9 MICHAEL BURMAN, ESQ. Burman Critton, etc. 10 515 North Flagler Street West Palm Beach, FL 33401 11 561.842.2820 12 JACK A. GOL

'indirect injuries, that is injuries sustained not as a direct result of predicate acts . . . will not allow recovery under Florida RICO." (quoting O'Malley v. St. Thomas Univ., Inc., 599 So. 2d 999, 1000 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992))) (emphasis added). Because the Amended Complaint does not satisfy the direct-in

South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Fax. 561 828 0983 Counsel for Defendant Robert D. Critton, Esq. Michael J. Pike, Esq. Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman, LLP 515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Fax. 561 515 3148 Co-Counsel for Jeffrey Epstein 25 Lew

rt, Esq. Bruce E. Reinhart, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Fax. 561 828 0983 Counsel for Defendant Robert D. Critton, Esq. Michael J. Pike, Esq. Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman, LLP 515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Fax. 561 515

indirect injuries, that is injuries sustained not as a direct result of predicate acts . . . will not allow recovery under Florida RICO."' (quoting O'Malley v. St. Thomas Univ., Inc., 599 So. 2d 999, 1000 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992))) (emphasis added). Because the Amended Complaint does not satisfy the direct-in

tralian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach Florida 33401 Fax. Counsel for Defendant Robert D. Critton, Esq. Michael J. Pike, Esq. Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman, LLP 515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400 West Palm Beach Florida 33401 Fax. Co-Counsel for Jeffrey Epstein 25 LeVykt:11:, in

ruce E. Reinhart, Esq. Bruce E. Reinhart, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach Florida 33401 Fax. Counsel for Defendant Robert D. Critton, Esq. Michael J. Pike, Esq. Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman, LLP 515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400 West Palm Beach Florida 33401 Fax. Co-Coun

indirect injuries, that is injuries sustained not as a direct result of predicate acts . . . will not allow recovery under Florida RICO."' (quoting O'Malley v. St. Thomas Univ., Inc., 599 M. 2d 999, 1000 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992))) (emphasis added). Because the Amended Complaint does not satisfy the direct-inj

for Defendant Bruce E. P . Bruce E. , P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Fax. Counsel for Defendant Robert D. Critton, Esq. Michael J. Pike, Esq. Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman, LLP 515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Fax. Co-Cou

tralian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Fax. Counsel for Defendant Robert D. Critton, Esq. Michael J. Pike, Esq. Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman, LLP 515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Fax. Co-Counsel for Jeffrey Epstein 25 Lewis Fein ,. )

'indirect injuries, that is injuries sustained not as a direct result of predicate acts . . wit! not allow recovery under Florida RICO."' (quoting O'Malley v. St. Univ., Inc., 599 So. 2d 999, 1000 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992))) (emphasis added). Because the Amended Complaint does not satisfy the direct-injury

efendant, Epstein's Motion to Dismiss. Robed RDC/clz Enclosures cc: Theodore J. Leopold, Esq. and Spencer T. Kuvin, Esq. Jack Goldberger, Esq. Critton, Jr., Esq. •A•W•Y•E •N•S EFTA00614424 IN THE COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 502008CA0

224 (3d Cir. 2007). 8. Petrol LTD v. Radulovic, 764 So.2d 878 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). DIRECT INJURIES MUST BE SUSTAINED TO PROPERLY ALLEGE RICO 1. O'Malley v. St. Thomas Univ., Inc. 599 So.2d 999, 1000 (Fla. 3d (DCA 1992). 2. Palmus Y Bambu, S.A. v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Company, 881 So.2d 565 (Fl

r Defendant Jeffrey Epstein Counsel for Plaintiff P.A. EFTA00722708 a v. Epstein, et al. Page 3 BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER F4 i By: Robert . Critton, Jr. Florid Bar #224162 Mich el J. Pike Florida Bar #617296 (Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey E. Epstein) EFTA00722709 7 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF

224 (3d Cir. 2007). 8. Petrol LTD v. Radulovic, 764 So.2d 878 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). DIRECT INJURIES MUST BE SUSTAINED TO PROPERLY ALLEGE RICO 1. O'Malley v. St. Thomas Univ., Inc. 599 So.2d 999, 1000 (Fla. 3d (DCA 1992). 2. Palmus Y Bambu, S.A. v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Company, 881 So.2d 565 (Fl

0 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 561-659-8300 561-835-8691 Fax Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein By: ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ. Florida Bar No. 224162 MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN 515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400

lorida looks to Federal authority regarding the interpretation and application of its Acts, citing 18 U.S.C. 1961, et seq. and Fla. Stat. 772.104); O'Malley v. St.. Thomas Univ.. Inc., 599 So.2d 999, 1000 (Ha. 3d DCA 1992)("Since Florida Rico is patterned after Federal RICO. . . .[f]ederal decisions sho

, Esq. McIntosh, Sawran, Peltz & Cartaya P.A. Counsel for Defendant Haley Robson Bruce E. Reinhart, Esq. Bruce E. Reinhart, P.A. n an •ra e en Robert D. Critton, Esq. Michael J. Pike, Esq. Burman, Critton, Luther & Coleman LL' o- ounse or cirey Epstein 25 Lewis Teinrv. 3059 Gum) Avow,. Sum 140. Cot owl

indirect injuries, that is injuries sustained not as a direct result of predicate acts . . . will not allow recovery under Florida RICO."' (quoting O'Malley v. St. Thomas Univ., Inc., 599 So. 2d 999, 1000 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992))) (emphasis added). Because the Amended Complaint does not satisfy the direct-in