Epstein Secrets

n of witnesses at trial." Accordingly, Plaintiffs request that Epstein be prevented from attending her deposition should be denied. See Anderson v. Snyder, 91 Conn. 404,408, 99 A. 1032 (1917); Helfferich v. Farley, 36 Conn.Sup. 333,334, 419 A.2d 913 (1980). If this Court excludes Defendant from deposit

e Doe adopted Jane Doe 2-8's Motion for Sanctions, denying that as well, and for such other and further relief as this court deems just and • be . Critton, Jr. Mic ell Pike Attorneys for Defendant Epstein Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 326 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/24/2009 Page 11 of 13 Page

Plaintiffs request that Epstein be prevented from attending her deposition and that a special master be appointed should be denied. See Anderson v. Snyder, 91 Conn. 404, 408, 99 A. 1032 (1917); Helfferich v. Farley, 36 Conn.Sup. 333, 334, 419 A.2d 913 (1980). If this Court excludes Defendant from depo

ling the Deposition of Jane Doe No. 4 (DE 305). Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 322 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2009 Page 11 of 13 Page 11 obert D. Critton, Jr. Michael J. Pike Attorney for Defendant Epstein Certificate of Service I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was electronically filed

s reveal that there is no genuine issue of 4 EFTA00725972 material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See Snyder v. Cheezem Development Corp., 373 So. 2d 719, 720 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979); Rule 1.510(c), Fla. R. Civ. P. Once the moving party conclusively establishes

ffort to resolve the issues set forth herein. Plaintiff's position is that the parties have already complied with the mediation requirements. By: s/Robert D. Critton, Jr. Robert D. Critton, Jr. Michael J. Pike Attorneys for Defendant Epstein EFTA00725996 Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 168 Entered on FLSD D